Skip to main content

Distinguishing Phenogrammar from Tectogrammar Simplifies the Analysis of Interrogatives

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7395))

Abstract

Oehrle (1994) introduced a categorial grammar architecture in which word order is represented using the terms of a typed λ-calculus and the syntactic type system is based on linear logic. In this paper, we use a variant of this architecture to analyze interrogatives in English and Chinese. We show that separating word order (phenogrammar) and syntactic combinatorics (tectogrammar) in this way brings out the underlying similarities between different question-forming strategies. In particular, the difference between wh extraction (overt movement) and wh in situ (covert movement) turns out to be purely phenogrammatical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldridge, Jason, Lexically Specied Derivational Control in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis. University of Edinburgh (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H.: Some logical aspects of grammatical structure. In: Jakobson, R. (ed.) Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groote, P.: Towards Abstract Categorial Grammar. In: Proceedings of ACL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 1 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Y.: Prosody, syntax and pragmatics of WH-questions. English Linguistics 22, 2 (2005) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, L., Scott, P.J.: Introduction to Higher Order Categorical Logic. Cambridge University Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in English. In: Thomason, R. (ed.) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: Generalized quantification and discontinuous type constructors. In: Bunt, H., van Horck, A. (eds.) Discontinuous Constituency. Mouton de Gruyter (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moortgat, M.: Categorial type logics. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glyn, M., Fada, M., Valentin, O.: Nondeterministic discontinuous Lambek calculus. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2007), Tilburg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R.: Language, lambdas, and logic. In: Kruijff, G.-J., Oehrle, R. (eds.) Resource Sensitivity in Binding and Anaphora. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R.: Sense and the computation of reference. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 4 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R.: Intensional models for the theory of types. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 72, 1 (2007a)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R.: Separating syntax and combinatorics in categorial grammar. Research on Language and Computation 5, 3 (2007b)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T.: Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oehrle, R.: Term-labeled categorial type systems. Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 6 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.: Type-Logical HPSG. In: Jäger, G., Monachesi, P., Penn, G., Wintner, S. (eds.) Proceedings of Formal Grammar 2004, pp. 107–124. European Summer School in Language, Logic, and Information, Nancy (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.: Hyperintensions. Journal of Logic and Computation 18, 2 (2008a)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C.: Hyperintensional Questions. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLic 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5110, pp. 272–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E.A.: Correlational Comparison in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics. The Ohio State University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, D.: Movement of WH-phrases in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 4 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R.: A model theory for propositional attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 1 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaat, W.: The Logic of Variation. A Cross-Linguistic Account of Wh-Question Formation. Ph.D. thesis. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mihaliček, V., Pollard, C. (2012). Distinguishing Phenogrammar from Tectogrammar Simplifies the Analysis of Interrogatives. In: de Groote, P., Nederhof, MJ. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG FG 2010 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32023-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32024-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics