Skip to main content

A Comparison of the DCT JPEG and Wavelet Image Compression Encoder for Medical Images

  • Conference paper
  • 1988 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 306))

Abstract

Compression is becoming very necessary in today’s time especially in the medical field. The reason for this is that the current analog film based medical images are very difficult to manage and can be easily damaged if exposed to sunlight. Digital images are more reliable and easier to manage but occupy a lot of computer space. Compressed medical images occupy less space and can be easily transmitted over the network in lesser amount of time. In this paper two algorithms have been discussed: The JPEG DCT image compression and the JPEG wavelet compression. The algorithms have been compared on the values obtained for the Mean Square Error and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio. The results show that wavelet compression gives better quality for the same compression ratio in comparison to DCT compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdullah, B.J.J., Ng, K.H., Pathmanathan, R.R.: The Impact of Teleradiology in Clinical Practice –A Malaysian Perspective. Med. J. Malaysia 54, 169–174.45 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson, B.J., Manduca, A., Palisson, P., et al.: Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 206, 599–607 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iyriboz, T.A., Zukoski, M.J., Hopper, K.D., Stag, P.L.: A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. J. Digit Imaging 12, 14–17 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed, N., Natarjan, T.: Discrete Cosine Transforms. IEEE Trans. Computers C-23, 90–93 (1974)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Vetterli, M., Kovacevic, J.: Wavelet and Subband Coding. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ansari, F.J., Ali, A. (2012). A Comparison of the DCT JPEG and Wavelet Image Compression Encoder for Medical Images. In: Parashar, M., Kaushik, D., Rana, O.F., Samtaney, R., Yang, Y., Zomaya, A. (eds) Contemporary Computing. IC3 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 306. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32129-0_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32129-0_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32128-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32129-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics