Skip to main content

Rankr: A Mobile System for Crowdsourcing Opinions

  • Conference paper
Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services (MobiCASE 2011)

Abstract

Evaluating large sets of items, such as business ideas, is a difficult task. While no one person has time to evaluate all the items, many people can contribute by each evaluating a few. Moreover, given the mobility of people, it is useful to allow them to evaluate items from their mobile devices. We present the design and implementation of a mobile service, Rankr, which provides a lightweight and efficient way to crowdsource the relative ranking of ideas, photos, or priorities through a series of pairwise comparisons. We discover that users prefer viewing two items simultaneously versus viewing one image at a time with better fidelity. Additionally, we developed an algorithm that determines the next most useful pair of candidates a user can evaluate to maximize the information gained while minimizing the number of votes required. Voters do not need to compare and manually rank all of the candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Value. Wiley (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. David, H.A.: The Method of Paired Comparisons. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Elo, A.E.: The rating of chess players: Past and present. Arco Publishing, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Green, P.E., Srinivasan, V.: Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. The Journal of Marketing 54(4), 3–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hacker, S., Ahn, L.V.: Matchin: Eliciting user preferences with an online game. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hochbaum, D.S.: The separation, and separation-deviation methodology for group decision making and aggregate ranking. In: Hasenbein, J.J. (ed.) TutORials in Operations Research, INFORMS, Hanover, MD, vol. 7, pp. 116–141 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sarma, A.D., Sarma, A.D., Gollapudi, S., Panigrahy, R.: Ranking mechanisms in twitter-like forums. In: Proc. Conf. on Web Search and Data Mining (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Luon, Y., Aperjis, C., Huberman, B.A. (2012). Rankr: A Mobile System for Crowdsourcing Opinions. In: Zhang, J.Y., Wilkiewicz, J., Nahapetian, A. (eds) Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services. MobiCASE 2011. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 95. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32320-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32320-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32320-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics