Skip to main content

Provision and Appropriation of Common-Pool Resources without Full Disclosure

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7455))

Abstract

Some open systems use mutually agreed rules to determine a decentralised allocation of endogenous common-pool resources, i.e. resources that are provided by the system components themselves. The problem is that some components may not comply to the rules, and an open system cannot demand the full disclosure required to verify compliance. This requires behaviour to be monitored, but monitoring must be ‘paid for’ from the same resources, detracting from the system’s capability to perform tasks for which it was intended. This paper addresses the problem from the perspective of principles for self-governing institutions, encapsulating a formal system of retributive justice. Experiments with a variant of the linear public good game show that self-organisation of operational-choice rules for monitoring and sanctioning can help to reduce costs, marginalise non-compliance and increase collective utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, A.: Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development 29(10), 1649–1672 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardagna, D., Panicucci, B., Passacantando, M.: A game theoretic formulation of the service provisioning problem in cloud systems. In: WWW 2011, pp. 177–186. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artikis, A.: Dynamic specification of open agent systems. Journal of Logic and Computation (2011), doi:10.1093/logcom/exr018

    Google Scholar 

  4. Artikis, A., Skarlatidis, A., Portet, F., Paliouras, G.: Logic-based event recognition. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1–39 (2011) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boulet, R., Mazzega, P., Jouve, B.: Environmental, social and normative networks in the MAELIA platform. In: Poblet, M., Schild, U., Zeleznikow, J. (eds.) Proc. ICAIL Worshop Legal & Decision Support Systems, pp. 83–93 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, M., Arnold, G., Villamayor Tomás, S.: A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15(4), 38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fehr, E., Gächter, S.: Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gächter, S.: Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. Discussion Papers 2006-03, School of Economics, University of Nottingham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 4(3), 427–443 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4, 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons. CUP, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ostrom, E., Walker, J., Gardner, R.: Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86(2), 404–417 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitt, J., Schaumeier, J., Artikis, A.: The axiomatisation of socio-economic principles for self-organising systems. In: Fifth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pp. 138–147 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pitt, J., Schaumeier, J., Artikis, A.: Coordination, Conventions and the Self-organisation of Sustainable Institutions. In: Kinny, D., Hsu, J.Y.-J., Governatori, G., Ghose, A.K. (eds.) PRIMA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7047, pp. 202–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Reuben, E., Riedl, A.: Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. IZA Discussion Papers 4303, Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strbac, G.: Demand side management: Benefits and challenges. Energy Policy 36(12), 4419–4426 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan, F.: Punishment in a linear public good game with productivity heterogeneity. De Economist 156, 269–293 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pitt, J., Schaumeier, J. (2012). Provision and Appropriation of Common-Pool Resources without Full Disclosure. In: Rahwan, I., Wobcke, W., Sen, S., Sugawara, T. (eds) PRIMA 2012: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7455. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32729-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32729-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32728-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32729-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics