Abstract
Human spatial relational reasoning has been investigated by presenting participants with premises like: “The triangle is to the left of the circle, the circle is to the left of the square. Which relation holds between the triangle and the square?” Participants are expected to interpret the descriptions in a way that corresponds to the logical options that are theoretically available. Recent findings on spatial language usage highlight a range of pragmatic principles that speakers intuitively adhere to when producing and comprehending spatial relationship descriptions; these appear to contradict the principles used in relational reasoning studies. In order to clarify the relation between speakers’ intuitions and the descriptions used in relational reasoning tasks, we present two studies in which linguistic representations of relevant configurations were elicited. Results highlight the systematic patterns speakers use in describing these configurations, adding new insights to research on spatial language usage across various levels of analysis. We argue that the identified principles may interfere with the reasoning processes investigated in earlier studies, and suggest that future studies should adequately account for the principles underlying intuitive spatial language use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andonova, E., Tenbrink, T., Coventry, K.R.: Function and Context Affect Spatial Information Packaging at Multiple Levels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 575–580 (2010)
Carlson, L.A., Hill, P.L.: Formulating Spatial Descriptions across Various Dialogue Contexts. In: Coventry, K., Tenbrink, T., Bateman, J. (eds.) Spatial Language and Dialogue, pp. 89–103. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
Clark, H.H.: Influence of language on solving three-term series problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82(2), 205–215 (1969a)
Clark, H.H.: Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review 76(4), 387–404 (1969b)
Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Coventry, K.R., Garrod, S.C.: Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Psychology Press, Hove and New York (2004)
De Soto, C.B., London, M., Handel, S.: Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2, 293–307 (1965)
Ehrich, V., Koster, C.: Discourse Organization and Sentence Form: The Structure of Room Descriptions in Dutch. Discourse Processes 6, 169–195 (1983)
Fodor, J.A.: The language of thought. Harvard, New York (1975)
Gerrig, R.J., Banaji, M.R.: Language and Thought. In: Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Thinking and Problem Solving, pp. 233–261. Academic Press, San Diego (1994)
Habel, C., Tappe, H.: Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In: von Stutterheim, C., Klabunde, R. (eds.) Processes in Language Production, pp. 117–153. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen (1999)
Halford, G.S., Smith, S.B., Dickson, J.C., Maybery, M.T., Kelly, M.E., Bain, J.D., Stewart, J.E.M.: Modeling the Development of Reasoning Strategies: The Roles of Analogy, Knowledge, and Capacity. In: Simon, T.J., Halford, G.S. (eds.) Developing Cognitive Competence: New Approaches to Process Modeling, pp. 77–156. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1995)
Halliday, M.A.K.: An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. Arnold, London (1994)
Helfenstein, S., Saariluoma, P.: Apperception in primed problem solving. Cognitive Processing 8, 211–232 (2007)
Herskovits, A.: Language and Spatial Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., Weidenfeld, A.: Between reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 10, 1805–1825 (2006)
Huttenlocher, J.: Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review 75, 550–560 (1968)
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental models and deduction. Trends in Cognitive Science 5, 434–442 (2001)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J.: Deduction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)
Knauff, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition 30, 363–371 (2002)
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C.: Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allens calculus. In: 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 200–205. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1995)
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., Strube, G.: Continuity effect and figural bias in spatial relational inference. In: 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 573–578. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)
Levelt, W.J.M.: Linearization in describing spatial networks. In: Peters, S., Saarinen, E. (eds.) Processes, Beliefs and Questions. Essays on Formal Semantics of Natural Language and Natural Language Processing, pp. 199–220. Reidel, Dordrecht (1982)
Linde, C., Labov, W.: Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language 51, 924–939 (1975)
Mani, K., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory and Cognition 10(2), 181–187 (1982)
Ormrod, J.E.: Cognitive Processes in the Solution of Three-Term Series Problems. The American Journal of Psychology 92(2), 235–255 (1979)
Orne, M.T., Whitehouse, W.G.: Demand characteristics. In: Kazdin, A.E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Psychology, pp. 469–470. American Psychological Association and Oxford Press, Washington, D.C. (2000)
Ragni, M., Fangmeier, T., Webber, L., Knauff, M.: Complexity in Spatial Reasoning. In: Sun, R., Miyake, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Annual Cognitive Science Conference, pp. 1986–1991. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)
Ragni, M., Fangmeier, T., Webber, L., Knauff, M.: Preferred Mental Models: How and Why They Are So Important in Human Reasoning with Spatial Relations. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds.) Spatial Cognition V. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4387, pp. 175–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Knauff, M., Kuß, T., Schlieder, C., Strube, G.: Preferred and alternative mental models in spatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation 5, 239–269 (2005)
Schleipen, S., Ragni, M., Fangmeier, T.: Negation in Spatial Reasoning: A Computational Approach. In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Talmy, L.: Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 2 vols. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Tenbrink, T.: Space, time, and the use of language: An investigation of relationships. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2007)
Tenbrink, T., Coventry, K.R., Andonova, E.: Spatial strategies in the description of complex configurations. Discourse Processes 48, 237–266 (2011)
Van der Henst, J.B., Politzer, G., Sperber, D.: When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8, 1–20 (2002)
Vorwerg, C., Tenbrink, T.: Discourse Factors Influencing Spatial Descriptions in English and German. In: Barkowsky, T., Knauff, M., Ligozat, G., Montello, D.R. (eds.) Spatial Cognition V. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4387, pp. 470–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tenbrink, T., Ragni, M. (2012). Linguistic Principles for Spatial Relational Reasoning. In: Stachniss, C., Schill, K., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition VIII. Spatial Cognition 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7463. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32732-2_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32731-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32732-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)