Skip to main content

Evaluating Multiple Choice Question Generator

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Technology (KTW 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 295))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantic-based computer-assisted automated question generator has been increasingly popular as a tool for creating personalized assessment questions.Various question generator tools have been proposed, such as those which generate structured question from a text file, generate Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) from a text file or from ontology-based knowledge representation. A comparison framework and evaluation methodology is required to evaluate different question generator tools. This paper discusses the requirement and criteria to carry out performance comparison of different MCQ generator. A feature comparison of Question Generation (QG) tool, namely Mimos-QG with the existing QG tools is presented. We have evaluated our QG tool based on several standard criteria such as the correctness of (a) distractor generation, (b) answer choice grouping strategy and (c) syntactical and pedagogical quality on three different domain ontologies. The experimental result indicated that Mimos-QG is capable of producing good quality direct type and grouping type multiple choice questions.

The authors developed this system under the Semantic Technology Research & Development initiative funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrenucci, A., Sneiders, E.: Automated Question Answering: Review of the Main Approaches. In: 3rd International Conf. on Information Technology and Applications, pp. 514–519 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGough, J., Mortensen, J., Johnson, J., Fadali, S.: A Web-Based Testing System with Dynamic Question Generation. In: 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, vol. 3, pp. 3–23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, W.M., Hao, T.Y., Liu, W.Y.: Automatic Question Generation for Learning Evaluation in Medicine. In: Leung, H., Li, F., Lau, R., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4823, pp. 242–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonathan, C., Gwen, A., Eskenazi, E.M.: Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Canada, pp. 819–826 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burdescu, D.D., Mihaescu, M.C.: Building a decision support system for students by using concept maps. Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2008), Spain (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Kanaris, K.: Automatic generation of multiple-choice questions from domain ontologies. In: IADIS e-Learning 2008 Conference, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sicilia, M.A., Barriocanal, E.G.: On the convergence of formal ontologies and standardized e-learning. International Journal of Distance Education 3(2), 13–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Knight, C., Gasevic, D., Richards, G.: An ontology-based framework for bridging learning design and learning content. Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 23–27 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  10. Tosic, M., Cubric, M.: SeMCQ – Protégé Plugin for Automatic Ontology-Driven Multiple Choice Question Tests Generation. In: 11th Intl. Protégé Conference, Poster and Demo Session (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cubric, M.: Tosic. M.: Towards automatic generation of eAssessment using semantic web technologies. In: International Computer Assisted Assessment (CAA) Conference, Southampton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanescu, L., Spahiu, C.S., Ion, A., Spahiu, A.: Question Generation for Learning Evaluation. In: International Multi-Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, pp. 509–513 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heilman, M., Noah, S.A.: Question Generation via overgenerating transformations and ranking. In: The 14th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop on Question Generation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ishaq, A., Nanjappa, S.B., Acharya, S.: Method and system for automatically generating questions for a programming. Infosys Technologies Limited, assignee. Patent 12/319566 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsumori, S., Kaijiri, K.: System Design for Automatic Generation of Multiple Choice Questions Adapted to Students’ Understanding. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, Japan, pp. 541–546 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson, L.W., Sosniak, L.A.: Bloom’s Taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective The National Society For The Study Of Education (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tan, S.Y., Lukose, D.: System and method for ontology-based question generation. Mimos Berhad (Patent - Pending)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tan, SY., Kiu, CC., Lukose, D. (2012). Evaluating Multiple Choice Question Generator. In: Lukose, D., Ahmad, A.R., Suliman, A. (eds) Knowledge Technology. KTW 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 295. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32826-8_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32825-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32826-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics