Skip to main content

Capabilities and Levels of Maturity in IT-Based Case Management

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management (BPM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7481))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present the results of a case study where we compared the needs of case managers with the capabilities of case management software systems (CMS) in social work, health care, and the handling of complex claims in insurance. Building on existing maturity models, we relate capabilities with maturity levels and present the C3M maturity model for IT-based case management.

Whereas vendors of business process management suites (BPMS) argue that case management requires flexible process guidance and improved context-sensitive information handling, we identify case assessment and case similarity as key capabilities of future CMS. We show how these and other capabilities are implemented in CMS today and discuss future trends of how CMS capabilities will evolve further. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of CMS technology on the practice of case management in an organization.

Our results are beneficial for the evaluation of CMS. They support organizations in mastering levels of maturity when using CMS, help them exploiting their benefits and addressing associated risks. The results also help BPMS vendors in adding the ‘right’ case-management capabilities to their BPM software when addressing case-oriented work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davenport, T.H.: Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Mcgraw-Hill (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McLellan, A.T., et al.: Does clinical case management improve outpatient addiction treatment? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 55, 91–103 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziguras, S.J., Stuart, G.W.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychatric Services 51(11), 1410–1421 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Swenson, K.: Mastering The Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize The Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin, R., Iansiti, M.: The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Mcgraw-Hill (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moxley, D.P.: Case management by design: reflections on principles and practices. Nelson-Hall Publishers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kraft, F.M.: Improving knowledge work. In: Swenson, K. (ed.): Mastering the Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Done, pp. 181–210. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzsimmons, J., Fitzsimmons, M.: Service Management - Operations, Strategy, Information Technology. McGraw Hill (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kie, T., Monzer, M.: Case Management und Soziale Dienste. In: Evers, A., Heinze, R.G. (eds.): Handbuch Soziale Dienste, pp. 499–515. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, D.M.: The business process maturity model - a practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization. BPTrends (September 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bruin, T.D., Rosemann, M.: Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Proc. 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf, C., Harmon, P.: The state of business process management. BP Trends (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Melenovsky, M.J., Sinur, J.: BPM maturity model identifies six phases for successful BPM adoption. Research Report G00142643, Gartner (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 111–123 (April 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Object Management Group: Business Process Maturity Model 1.0 (BPMM), OMG document number formal/2008-06-01 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snabe, J.H., Rosenberg, A., Moller, C., Scavillo, M.: Business Process Management - the SAP Roadmap. SAP Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koehler, J., Hofstetter, J., Woodtly, R. (2012). Capabilities and Levels of Maturity in IT-Based Case Management. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32884-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32885-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics