Abstract
Defining the purpose of a system is non-trivial as, by definition, it arises from the relation with its environment. In this paper, we analyze relevant state of the art in the areas of General Systems Theory, Enterprise Engineering, Value Modeling, Enterprise Architecture and Business Modeling. Their main shortcoming essentially resides in lack of flexibly dealing with relativity of enterprise frontier definition. To address this issue, our research is focused on modeling different perspectives of enterprises as systems, namely construction, function and contribution. The approach presented in this paper involves 1) distinguishing the three mentioned perspectives and 2) articulating the concepts of each perspective so that an end-to-end, integrated, model is provided. To this end, we propose a conceptual framework that supports recursive contribution definition, by design. Specifying the value in a contribution perspective allows improved specification of the rationale behind value network establishment and system/subsystem bonding. We can now specify how each component of a system S contributes (provides value) not only to the purpose of S but to other purposes present in the value chains S participates in.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets Into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)
Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations, vol. 32(1), pp. 4–16 (1993)
Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Prentice Hall (2011)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer (2006)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Architecture - Building strategy into design. Netherlands Architecture Forum, Academic Service - SDU, The Hague, The Netherlands (2008)
Skyttner, L.: General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore (2005)
Maglio, P.P., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N., Spohrer, J.: The service system is the basic abstraction of the service science. Information Systems and eBusiness Management (2009)
Gordijn, J.: Value-based requirements Engineering: Exploring innovatie e-commerce ideas. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2002)
Cameron, B., Leaver, S., Worthington, B.: Value-Based Communication Boosts Business’ Perception of IT. Forrester Research (2009)
Ettema, R., Dietz, J.L.G.: ArchiMate and DEMO – Mates to Date? In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) CIAO!/EOMAS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 34, pp. 172–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
The Open Group, Archimate 2.0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing (2012)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Self-Published (2009)
Rosenberg, A., von Rosing, M., Chase, G., Omar, R., Taylor, J.: Applying Real-World BPM in an SAP Environment. SAP Press (2011)
Gordijn, J., Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Comparing two Business Model Ontologies for Designing eBusiness Models and Value Constellations. In: 18th Bled eConference - eIntegration in Action, Bled, Slovenia (2005)
Oliver, R.W.: Real-Time Strategy: What Is Strategy, Anyway? Journal of Business Strategy 22(6), 7–10 (2001)
Bleistein, S.J., Aurum, A., Cox, K., Ray, P.K.: Strategy-Oriented Alignment in Requirements Engineering: Linking Business Strategy to Requirements of e-Business Systems using the SOARE Approach. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 36(4), 259–276 (2004)
International Institute of Business Analysis, The Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Version 2.0 (2009)
Quartel, D., Engelsman, W., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: A goal-oriented requirements modelling language for enterprise architecture. In: IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, Auckland, New Zealand (2009)
Weigand, H., Heuvel, W.-J.V.D.: A Conceptual Architecture for Pragmatic Web Services. In: First International Conference on the Pragmatic Web, Stuttgart, Germany (2006)
Pombinho, J., Tribolet, J.: Modeling the Value of a System’s Production – Matching DEMO and e3Value. In: 6th International Workshop on Value Modeling and Business Ontology, Vienna, Austria (2012)
Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., Tribolet, J.: Towards Objective Business Modeling in Enterprise Engineering – Defining Function, Value and Purpose. In: Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Barjis, J. (eds.) EEWC 2012. LNBIP, vol. 110, pp. 93–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Weigand, H., Johannesson, P., Andersson, B., Bergholtz, M., Edirisuriya, A., Ilayperuma, T.: On the Notion of Value Object. In: Martinez, F.H., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4001, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press (1998)
Boehm, B.: Value-Based Software Engineering. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 28(2), 4 (2003)
Streitfeld, D.: Amazon Signing Up Authors, Writing Publishers Out of Deal. New York Times, A1 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D., Tribolet, J. (2012). Towards Value-Oriented Enterprise Engineering – Relativity in Service System Networks. In: Rahman, H., Mesquita, A., Ramos, I., Pernici, B. (eds) Knowledge and Technologies in Innovative Information Systems. MCIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33244-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33244-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33243-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33244-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)