Skip to main content

Argument Diagrams in Facebook: Facilitating the Formation of Scientifically Sound Opinions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7563))

Abstract

Students use Facebook to organize their classroom experiences [1], but hardly to share and form opinions on subject matters. We explore the benefits of argument diagrams for the formation of scientific opinion on behaviorism in Facebook. We aim at raising awareness of opinion conflict and structuring the argumentation with scripts [2]. A lab study with University students (ten dyads per condition) compared the influence of argument structuring (students built individual argument diagrams before discussing in Facebook) vs. no argument structuring (only Facebook discussion) on opinion formation, measured through opinion change. The argumentation script was implemented in the web-based system LASAD to support sound argumentation [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lampe, C., Wohn, D., Vitak, J., Ellison, N., Wash, R.: Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6(3), 329–347 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F.: Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior 26(4), 506–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., Scheuer, O., McLaren, B.M.: How Tough Should It Be? Simplifying the Development of Argumentation Systems using a Configurable Platform. In: Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M. (eds.) Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills, Bentham Science Publishers (to appear) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsovaltzi, D., Weinberger, A., Scheuer, O., Dragon, T., McLaren, B.M. (2012). Argument Diagrams in Facebook: Facilitating the Formation of Scientifically Sound Opinions. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds) 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. EC-TEL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7563. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33263-0_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33262-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33263-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics