Abstract
Many real world problems involve multiple criteria that should be considered separately and optimized simultaneously. A Multi-Objective Constraint Optimization Problem (MO-COP) is the extension of a mono-objective Constraint Optimization Problem (COP). In a MO-COP, it is required to provide the most preferred solution for a user among many optimal solutions. In this paper, we develop a novel Interactive Algorithm for MO-COP (MO-IA). The characteristics of this algorithm are as follows: (i) it can guarantee to find a Pareto solution, (ii) it narrows a region, in which Pareto front may exist, gradually, (iii) it is based on a pseudo-tree, which is a widely used graph structure in COP algorithms, and (iv) the complexity of this algorithm is determined by the induced width of problem instances. In the evaluations, we use an existing model for representing a utility function, and show empirically the effectiveness of our algorithm. Furthermore, we propose an extension of MO-IA, which can provide the more detailed information for Pareto front.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bringmann, K., Friedrich, T., Neumann, F., Wagner, M.: Approximation-guided evolutionary multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1198–1203 (2011)
Das, I., Dennis, J.E.: Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM Journal on Optimization 8(3), 631–657 (1998)
Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2003)
Erfani, T., Utyuzhnikov, S.V.: Directed search domain: a method for even generation of the Pareto frontier in multiobjective optimization. Engineering Optimization 43(5), 467–484 (2010)
Fave, F.M.D., Stranders, R., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R.: Bounded decentralised coordination over multiple objectives. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 371–378 (2011)
Junker, U.: Preference-based inconsistency proving: When the failure of the best is sufficient. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 118–122 (2006)
Marinescu, R.: Exploiting Problem Decomposition in Multi-objective Constraint Optimization. In: Gent, I.P. (ed.) CP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5732, pp. 592–607. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Marinescu, R.: Best-first vs. depth-first and/or search for multi-objective constraint optimization. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 439–446 (2010)
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press (1995)
Messac, A., Mattson, C.: Generating well-distributed sets of Pareto points for engineering design using physical programming. Optimization and Engineering 3(4), 431–450 (2002)
Messac, A., Puemi-sukam, C., Melachrinoudis, E.: Aggregate objective functions and Pareto frontiers: Required relationships and practical implications. Optimization and Engineering 1(2), 171–188 (2000)
Miettinen, K.: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999)
Papadimitriou, C.H., Yannakakis, M.: On the approximability of trade-offs and optimal access of web sources. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 86–92 (2000)
Perny, P., Spanjaard, O.: Near admissible algorithms for multiobjective search. In: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 490–494 (2008)
Rollon, E., Larrosa, J.: Bucket elimination for multiobjective optimization problems. Journal of Heuristics 12(4-5), 307–328 (2006)
Rollon, E., Larrosa, J.: Multi-objective Russian doll search. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 249–254 (2007)
Schiex, T., Fargier, H., Verfaillie, G.: Valued constraint satisfaction problems: Hard and easy problems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 631–639 (1995)
Stiglitz, J.E.: Economics. W.W.Norton & Company (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Okimoto, T., Joe, Y., Iwasaki, A., Matsui, T., Hirayama, K., Yokoo, M. (2012). Interactive Algorithm for Multi-Objective Constraint Optimization. In: Milano, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33557-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33558-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)