Skip to main content

Assessing the User Satisfaction with an Ontology Engineering Tool Based on Social Processes

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops (OTM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7567))

Abstract

This study discusses one of the three measures defined within the usability testing, namely the user satisfaction, when evaluating an ontology engineering tool based on social processes. The motivation of our focus lays in the fact that being driven by communities through social interactions, the ontology engineering process depends on what the user does, sees and feels when using the system. The evaluation criteria proposed here are therefore developed by looking at the people involved, the processes and their outcomes, mostly taking into account the user experience, in an approach that goes beyond usability. The paper identifies the problems the users encounter when using the system, both at a technical level and psychometric level. A set of recommendations is proposed in order to overcome these problems and to improve the user experience with the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lewis, J.R.: IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. Technical Report 54.786 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. J. of Human-Computer Interaction 14(3), 463–488 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, J.R.: Usability testing. In: Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 4th edn., pp. 1267–1312. John Wiley, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fruhling, A., Lee, S.: Assessing the Reliability, Validity and Adaptability of PSSUQ. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis, J.R.: Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. J. of Human-Computer Interaction 14(3), 463–488 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Debruyne, C., Meersman, R.: GOSPL: A Method and Tool for Fact-Oriented Hybrid Ontology Engineering. In: Morzy, T., Haerder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds.) ADBIS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7503, pp. 153–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Debruyne, C., Meersman, R.: Semantic Interoperation of Information Systems by Evolving Ontologies through Formalized Social Processes. In: Eder, J., Bielikova, M., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) ADBIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6909, pp. 444–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Meersman, R.: The use of lexicons and other computer-linguistic tools in semantics, design and cooperation of database systems. In: CODAS 1999, pp. 1–14. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verheyden, P., De Bo, J., Meersman, R.: Semantically Unlocking Database Content Through Ontology-Based Mediation. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dillon, A.: Beyond usability: process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Science 26(4), 57–69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO. ISO 9241-11:1998: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display ter-minals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. Source (1998), http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=16883

  12. Eason, K.: Information Technology and Organizational Change. Taylor and Francis, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eason, K.: Sociotechnical systems theory in the 21st Century: another half-filled glass?, Sense in Social Science: A collection of essays in honour of Dr. Lisl Klein, Desmond Graves, Broughton, pp. 123–134 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baecker, R., Grudin, J., Buxton, W., Greenberg, S.: Readings in Human-Computer Interaction. In: Toward the Year 2000. Morgan-Kaufman, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dillon, A.: Group dynamics meet cognition: combining socio-technical concepts and usability engineering in the design of information systems. In: The New Socio Tech: Graffitti on the Long Wall, pp. 119–126. Springer, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ciuciu, I., Debruyne, C. (2012). Assessing the User Satisfaction with an Ontology Engineering Tool Based on Social Processes. In: Herrero, P., Panetto, H., Meersman, R., Dillon, T. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7567. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33618-8_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33618-8_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33617-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33618-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics