Skip to main content

Towards a Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Safety Assurance Reuse

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7613))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The increasing complexity and size of electronic systems in the aerospace industry, combined with the growing market demand, requires the industry to implement an efficient safety assurance strategy. Reuse of safety argumentation and evidence for certification is one of the potential means for achieving such a strategy. Typically, major problems arise when the evolution of complex avionics entails the reconstruction of the entire body of safety justification, often resulting in expensive and time-consuming assurance and certification processes. This paper investigates the use of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) as a strategy for representing, retrieving and reusing previously assured safety cases. This is supported by the existence of patterns of safety cases, which determine a unified knowledge representation scheme for retrieving further safety cases. We illustrate the approach with the development of modular argumentation for an Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sahar, B., Ardi, S., Kazuhiko, S., Yoshiomi, M., Hirotsugu, M.: HAZOP Management System with Dynamic Visual Model Aid. American Journal of Applied Sciences 7(7), 943–948 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao, C., Bhushan, M., Venkatasubramanian, V.: PHASUITE: An automated HAZOP analysis tool for chemical processes Part I: Knowledge Engineering Framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 83(B6), 509–532 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daramola, O., Stalhane, T., Moser, T., Biffl, S.: A conceptual framework for semantic case-based safety analysis. In: 2011 IEEE 16th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly, T.: Arguing Safety - A Systematic Approach to Managing Safety Cases. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, The University of York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkins, R., Kelly, T.: A software Safety Argument Pattern Catalogue, Department of Computer Science, The University of York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stensrud, E., Skramstad, T., Li, J., Xie, J.: Towards Goal-based Software Safety Certification Based on Prescriptive Standards. In: International Workshop on Software Certification, WoSoCER (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. IEC61508, 61508 - Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems. International Electrotechnical Commission (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. RTCA DO-178/EUROCAE ED-12, Software Considerations in Airborne System and Equipment Certification

    Google Scholar 

  9. RTCA DO-254/EUROCAE ED-80 Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware

    Google Scholar 

  10. RTCA DO-297/EUROCAE ED-124 Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) Development Guidance and Certification Considerations

    Google Scholar 

  11. SAE ARP4754/EUROCAE ED-79, Certification Considerations for Highly Integrated or Complex Aircraft Systems

    Google Scholar 

  12. SAE ARP4761, Guidelines and Methods for Conducting The Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment

    Google Scholar 

  13. Origin Consulting GSN Community Standard Version 1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Everdij, M.H.C., Blom, H.A.P., Kirwan, B.: Development of a structured database of safety methods. In: 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM8 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson, C.W., Robins, D.A.: Mith and barriers to the Introduction of Safety Cases in Space-Based Systems

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly, T.: Using Software Architecture Techniques to Support the Modular Certification of Safety-Critical Systems. In: Cant, T. (ed.) Proceedings of Eleventh Australian Workshop on Safety-Related Programmable Systems, Melbourne, Australia. CRPIT. ACS (August 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayhurst, K.J., Maddalon, J.M., Miner, P.S., Szatkowski, G.N., Ulrey, M.L., DeWalt, M.P., Spitzer, C.R.: Preliminary Considerations for Classifying Hazards of Unmanned Aircraft Systems. NASA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST): Guidelines for Assessing Software Partitioning/Protection Schemes. FAA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bloomfield, R., Bishop, P.: Safety and Assurance Cases: Past, Present and Possible Future – an Adelard Perspective. In: 18th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium (SSS 2010), Bristol, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO26262 Road vehicles – Functional safety, ISO (November 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Total Product Life Cycle: Infusion Pump – Premarket Notification, Draft Guidance (April 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aerospace guidelines for the development of civil aircraft and system ARP 4754A

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eveleens: Integrated Modular Avionics Development Guidance and Certification Considerations (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications 7(1), 39–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Habli, I., Kelly, T.: Process and Product Certification Arguments – Getting the Balance Right. Workshop on Innovative Techniques for Certification of Embedded Systems, the Proceedings of 12th IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium, San Jose, California, USA (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruiz, A., Habli, I., Espinoza, H. (2012). Towards a Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Safety Assurance Reuse. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33674-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33675-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics