Abstract
This paper describes an innovative methodological approach developed within the SAFROS European project (Patient Safety in Robotic Surgery, FP7) that allows to identify a set of metrics for the evaluation of patient safety during the pre- and intra-operative phase of robotic interventions. This methodology enlarges the focus of the evaluation: safety is assessed not only through the analysis of features and limitations of the technological solutions involved in the execution of target surgical interventions (product safety) but also in terms of the effects of their interaction within the surgical scenario (process safety). Moreover potentialities and obstacles emerging from the introduction of such technologies into the operating room and the hospital as systems (organizational safety) are evaluated. The proposed method has been applied to the analysis of one gold standard and two benchmark procedures. The output of the analysis is a complex set of key metrics addressing safety at the above described levels. This paper reports the most relevant and interesting subset of the obtained results. The extendibility of the method to the analysis of other interventions will be verified with suitable experiments in the next future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/patient_safety/en/index.html
Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S.: To err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)
Edington, M. (ed.): Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine Report, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2001)
Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force, Doing what counts for patient safety: Federal actions to reduce medical errors and their impact. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Washington, DC (2000)
Makary, M.A., Sexton, J.B., Freischlag, J.A., Millman, E.A., Pryor, D., Holzmueller, C., Pronovost, P.J.: Patient safety in surgery. Annals of Surgery 243(5), 628–635 (2006), doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f
Gutt, C.N., Oniu, T., Mehrabi, A., Kashfi, A., Schemmer, P., Büchler, M.W.: Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. British Journal of Surgery 91(11), 1390–1397 (2004), doi:10.1002/bjs.4700
Herron, D.M., Marohn, M.: The SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 22(2), 313–325 (2008), doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5.
Nio, D., Diks, J., Bemelman, W.A., Wisselink, W., Legemate, D.A.: Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 33, 263–271 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.10.004
Martinie, J.B., Smeaton, S.M.: Laparoscopic Approaches to Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors. In: Greene, F.L., Heniford, B.T. (eds.) Minimally Invasive Cancer Management, Part 3, pp. 145–157 (2010)
Yuh, B.E., Hussain, A., Chandrasekhar, R., Bienko, M., Piacente, P., Wilding, G., Menon, M., Peabody, J., Guru, K.A.: Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot assisted surgery. J. Endourol. 24(10), 1637–1644 (2010), doi:10.1089/end.2010.0024
Borden Jr., L.S., Kozlowski, P.M., Porter, C.R., Corman, J.M.: Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. Canadian Journal of Urology 14, 3499–3501 (2007)
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRES/res.cfm
Murphy, D.G., Bjartell, A., Ficarra, V., Graefen, M., Haese, A., Montironi, R., Montorsi, F., Moul, J.W., Novara, G., Sauter, G., Sulser, T., van der Poel, H.: Downsides of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Limitations and Complications. European Urology 57(5), 735–746 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.021
Antoniou, G.A., Riga, C.V., Mayer, E.K., Cheshire, N.J.W., Bicknell, C.D.: Clinical applications of robotic technology in vascular and endovascular surgery. Journal of Vascular Surgery 53(2), 493–499 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.154
Zureikat, A.H., Nguyen, K.T., Bartlett, D.L., Zeh, H.J., Moser, A.J.: Robotic-Assisted Major Pancreatic Resection and Reconstruction. Archives of Surgery 146(3), 256–261 (2011), doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.246
Kaushik, D., High, R., Clark, C.J., LaGrange, C.A.: Malfunction of the da Vinci Robotic System During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: An International Survey. Journal of Endourology 24(4), 571–575 (2010), doi: 10.1089=end.2009.0489
Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The Goal Question Metric Approach. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Wiley (1994)
Thammarak, K., Intakosum, S.: OPI model: A methodology for development metric based on outcome oriented. In: 8th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, JCSSE (2011), doi:10.1109/JCSSE.2011.5930144
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook (CAMH) Oakbrook Terrace, IL (2002)
Vincent, C., Moorthy, K., Sarker, S.K., Chang, A., Darzi, A.W.: System approaches to surgical quality and safety – From concept to measurements. Annals of Surgery 239(4), 475–482 (2004), doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000118753.22830.41
Pronovost, P.J., Berenholtz, S.M., Goeschel, C.A., et al.: High Reliability in Health Care Organizations. Serv. Res. 41(4 Pt 2), 1599–1617 (2006), doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00567.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Morandi, A., Verga, M., Oleari, E., Gasperotti, L., Fiorini, P. (2013). A Methodological Framework for the Definition of Patient Safety Measures in Robotic Surgery: The Experience of SAFROS Project. In: Lee, S., Cho, H., Yoon, KJ., Lee, J. (eds) Intelligent Autonomous Systems 12. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 194. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33932-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33932-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33931-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33932-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)