Skip to main content

Data Support in Process Model Abstraction

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7532))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process model abstraction is an effective approach to reduce the complexity and increase the understandability of process models. Several techniques provide process model abstraction capabilities, but none of them includes data in the abstraction procedure. To overcome this gap, we propose data abstraction capabilities for process model abstraction. The approach is based on use cases found in literature as well as encountered in practice. Altogether, we introduce a framework for data abstraction in process models and provide algorithmic guidance to apply it in practice. The approach is evaluated by an implementation and a scenario of a workshop organization, that contains process models on different levels of abstraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 2nd edn. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: Business Process Model Abstraction. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 149–166. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: The Triconnected Abstraction of Process Models. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 229–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Eshuis, R., Grefen, P.: Constructing Customized Process Views. Data & Knowledge Engineering 64(2), 419–438 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H., Nugteren, T., Weske, M.: Business Process Model Abstraction: Theory and Practice. Technical Report 35, Hasso Plattner Inst. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wahler, K., Küster, J.M.: Predicting Coupling of Object-Centric Business Process Implementations. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. OMG: Unified Modeling Language (UML), Version 2.2 (February 2009) , http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/ (accessed June 11, 2012)

  8. Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy Mining – Adaptive Process Simplification Based on Multi-perspective Metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, J., Kumar, A.: A Framework for Document-Driven Workflow Systems. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 285–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Polyvyanyy, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Dumas, M.: Structuring Acyclic Process Models. Information Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The Refined Process Structure Tree. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9), 793–818 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Polyvyanyy, A., Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H.: Simplified Computation and Generalization of the Refined Process Structure Tree. In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 25–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 20–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M.: A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 497–511. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Berthelot, G.: Transformations and Decompositions of Nets. Petri Nets: Central Models and Their Properties, 359–376 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., Bauer, T.: View-Based Process Visualization. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 88–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Smirnov, S.: Structural Aspects of Business Process Diagram Abstraction. In: Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 375–382. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meyer, A., Weske, M. (2012). Data Support in Process Model Abstraction. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7532. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34001-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34002-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics