Skip to main content

Ontology of Dynamic Entities

  • Conference paper
Book cover Conceptual Modeling (ER 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7532))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes “dynamic business entities”, ontological classes that dynamically acquire and lose properties and relationships as a function of other aspects of the entities. Specifically, we propose how acquisition and loss instructions for such transient properties may be inherent in the definition of the entities possessing them. We use SBVR to demonstrate the specification of dynamic business entities showing how our idea could be applied in practice. We illustrate with an example drawn from the Flanders Research Information Space.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s 7th Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 257593.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.A., March, S.T.: The Proper Role of Optionality and Negation in Conceptual Modeling. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on Research in Systems Analysis and Design, Richmond, VA, May 21-23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bera, P., Burton-Jones, A., Wand, Y.: The effect of domain familiarity on modelling roles: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of PACIS 2009, p. 110 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge, M.: Treatise on basic philosoph. In: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, vol. 3. Reidel, Boston (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Leenheer, P., Christiaens, S., Meersman, R.: Business semantics management: a case study for competency-centric HRM. Computers in Industry 61(8), 760–775 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55(3), 301–326 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Rudolph, S. (eds.): OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Primer. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/

  8. Hull, R., Damaggio, E., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath III, F(T.), Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P., Vaculin, R.: Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone Approach for Specifying Business Entity Lifecycles (Invited Talk). In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Moor, A., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: DOGMA-MESS: A Meaning Evolution Support System for Interorganizational Ontology Engineering. In: Schärfe, H., Hitzler, P., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4068, pp. 189–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. OMG: Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR

  12. OWL Working Group: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview. W3C Recommendation (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

  13. Parsons, J., Wand, Y.: Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 839–868 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Searle, J.R.: Social ontology. Anthropological Theory 6(1), 12–29 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wand, Y., Storey, V.C., Weber, R.: An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 24(4), 494–528 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Information Systems Journal 3(4), 217–237 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal 5(3), 203–223 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Welty, C., Fikes, R.: A Reusable Ontology for Fluents in OWL. In: Proceedings of FOIS, pp. 226–236. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Limonad, L., De Leenheer, P., Linehan, M., Hull, R., Vaculín, R. (2012). Ontology of Dynamic Entities. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7532. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34001-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34002-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics