Skip to main content

Challenges for Automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 131))

Abstract

Currently the documentation of an Enterprise Architecture (EA) is performed manually to a large extent. Due to the intrinsic complexity of today’s organizations this task is challenging and often perceived as very time-consuming and error-prone. Recent efforts in research and industry seek to automate EA documentation by retrieving and maintaining relevant information from productive systems. In this paper major challenges for an automated EA documentation are presented based on 1) a practical example from a global acting enterprise of the German fashion industry, 2) a literature review, and 3) a survey among 123 EA practitioners. The identified challenges are synthesized to four categories and constitute the foundation for future research efforts and pose new questions not yet considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berneaud, M., Buckl, S., Diaz-Fuentes, A., Matthes, F., Monahov, I., Nowobliska, A., Roth, S., Schweda, C.M., Weber, U., Zeiner, M.: Trends for enterprise architecture management tools survey. Technical report, Technische Universität München (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Lankes, J., Matthes, F.: Enterprise Architecture Management Pattern Catalog (Version 1.0). Technical report, Chair for Informatics 19 (sebis), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Monahov, I., Roth, S., Schulz, C., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise architecture management patterns for enterprise-wide access views on business objects. In: European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP) 2011, Irsee Monastery, Bavaria, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Roth, S., Schulz, C., Schweda, C.M.: A conceptual framework for enterprise architecture design. In: Workshop Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR), Delft, The Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Roth, S., Schulz, C., Schweda, C.M.: A method for constructing enterprise-wide access views on business objects. In: Informatik 2010: IT-Governance in verteilten Systemen (GVS 2010), Leipzig, Germany (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buschle, M., Ekstedt, M., Grunow, S., Hauder, M., Matthes, F., Roth, S.: Automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation using an Enterprise Service Bus (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buschle, M., Holm, H., Sommestad, T., Ekstedt, M., Shahzad, K.: A Tool for automatic Enterprise Architecture modeling, pp. 25–32 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farwick, M., Agreiter, B., Breu, R., Ryll, S., Voges, K., Hanschke, I.: Automation processes for enterprise architecture management. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, EDOCW 2011, pp. 340–349. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Farwick, M., Agreiter, B., Breu, R., Ryll, S., Voges, K., Hanschke, I.: Requirements for automated enterprise architecture model maintenance - a requirements analysis based on a literature review and an exploratory survey. ICEIS (4), 325–337 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, R., Aier, S., Winter, R.: A federated approach to enterprise architecture model maintenance. In: Reichert, M., Strecker, S., Turowski, K. (eds.) EMISA. LNI, vol. P-119, pp. 9–22. GI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine, vol. 20 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grunow, S., Matthes, F., Roth, S.: Towards Automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation: Data Quality Aspects of SAP PI. In: Morzy, T., Härder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds.) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. AISC, vol. 186, pp. 103–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hauder, M., Matthes, F., Roth, S., Schulz, C.: Generating dynamic cross-organizational process visualizations through abstract view model pattern matching. In: Architecture Modeling for Future Internet enabled Enterprise (AMFInE), Valencia, Spain (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. iteratec GmbH. iteraplan documentation home (2012), http://www.iteraplan.de/wiki/display/iteraplan/iteraplan+Documentation+Home

  15. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matthes, F., Schulz, C.: Towards an integrated data migration process model. Technical report, Technische Universität München, München, Germany (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moser, C., Junginger, S., Brückmann, M., Schöne, K.: Some process patterns for enterprise architecture management. In: Proceedings, Workshop on Patterns in Enterprise Architecture Management (PEAM 2009), Bonn, pp. 19–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murer, S., Bonati, B., Furrer, F.J., Murer, S., Bonati, B., Furrer, F.J.: Managed Evolution. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagios Enterprises. Nagios documentation (2012), http://www.nagios.org/documentation

  21. SAP AG. PI Best Practices Naming Conventions (2012), http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40a66d0e-fe5e-2c10-8a85-e418b59ab36a

  22. SAP AG. SAP help portal (2012), http://help.sap.com

  23. Schaub, M., Matthes, F., Roth, S.: Towards a conceptual framework for interactive enterprise architecture management visualizations. In: Modellierung, Bamberg, Germany (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Open Group. Archimate 2.0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process, pp. 1–13. Hampton Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Weill, P., Ross, J.: IT Savvy: What Top Executives Must Know to Go from Pain to Gain. Harvard Business Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Winter, K., Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schweda, C.M.: Investigating the state-of-the-art in enterprise architecture management method in literature and practice. In: 5th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, MCIS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hauder, M., Matthes, F., Roth, S. (2012). Challenges for Automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation. In: Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, E., Sanz, J.L. (eds) Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET TEAR 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34162-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34163-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics