Skip to main content

Decision-Making and Action Selection in Two Minds

  • Conference paper
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 196))

Abstract

This paper discusses the differences between decision-making and action selection. Human behavior can be viewed as the integration of output of System 1, i.e., unconscious automatic processes, and System 2, i.e., conscious deliberate processes. System 1 activates a sequence of automatic actions. System 2 monitors System 1’s performance according to the plan it has created and, at the same time, it activates future possible courses of actions. Decision-making narrowly refers to System 2’s slow functions for planning for the future and related deliberate activities, e.g., monitoring, for future planning. On the other hand, action selection refers to integrated activities including not only System 1’s fast activities but also System 2’s slow activities, not separately but integrally. This paper discusses the relationships between decision-making and action selection based on the architecture model the authors have developed for simulating human beings’ in situ action selection, Model Human Processor with Real time Constraints (MHP/RT) [3] by extending the argument we have done in the argument we have made in previous work [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kahneman, D.: A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist 58(9), 697–720 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitajima, M., Toyota, M.: Simulating navigation behaviour based on the architecture model Model Human Processor with Real-Time Constraints (MHP/RT). Behaviour & Information Technology 31(1), 41–58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitajima, M.: Organic Self-Consistent Field Theory (2012), http://oberon.nagaokaut.ac.jp/ktjm/organic-self-consistent-field-theory/

  5. Kitajima, M., Toyota, M.: Four Processing Modes of in situ Human Behavior. In: Samsonovich, A.V., Jóhannsdóttir, K.R. (eds.) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2011 - Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the BICA Society, pp. 194–199. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kitajima, M., Toyota, M., Shimada, H.: The Model Brain: Brain Information Hydro- dynamics (BIH). In: Love, B.C., McRae, K., Sloutsky, V.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, p. 1453. Cognitive Science Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kitajima, M., Shimada, H., Toyota, M.: MSA: Maximum Satisfaction Architecture – a basis for designing intelligent autonomous agents on web 2.0. In: McNamara, D.S., Trafton, J.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, p. 1790. Cognitive Science Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition (The William James Lectures, 1987). Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suchman, L.: Plans and situated actions: the problem of communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Toyota, M., Kitajima, M., Shimada, H.: Structured Meme Theory: How is informational inheritance maintained? In: Love, B.C., McRae, K., Sloutsky, V.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, p. 2288. Cognitive Science Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muneo Kitajima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kitajima, M., Toyota, M. (2013). Decision-Making and Action Selection in Two Minds. In: Chella, A., Pirrone, R., Sorbello, R., Jóhannsdóttir, K. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34274-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34274-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34273-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34274-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics