Skip to main content

Exploring Playability of Social Network Games

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Computer Entertainment (ACE 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7624))

Abstract

Social network games in Facebook are played by millions of players on daily basis. Due to their design characteristics, new challenges for game design and playability evaluations arise. We present a study where 18 novice inspectors evaluated a social game using playability heuristics. The objective is to explore possible domain-specific playability problems and to examine how the established heuristics suit for evaluating social games. The results from this study show that some implementations of the social games design characteristics can cause playability problems and that the established heuristics are suitable for evaluating social games. The study also revealed that inspectors had problems in interpreting cause and effect of the found problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baraf, E.: From Two Years to Two Months: Transforming a Studio. Gamasutra Online Magazine (2010), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4324/from_two_years_to_two_months_.php

  2. Bogost, I.: Cow Clicker: The Making of Obsession (2010), http://www.bogost.com/blog/cow_clicker_1.shtml

  3. Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J.: Using Heuristics to Improve the Playability of Games. In: CHI Conference, Vienna, Austria (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: Game Usability Heuristics (PLAY) for Evaluating and Designing Better Games: The Next Iteration. In: Ozok, A.A., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) OCSC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5621, pp. 557–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hertzum, M., Jacobsen, N.E.: The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction 13(4), 421–443 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Järvinen, A.: Game Design for Social Networks: Interaction Design for Playful Dispositions. In: Sandbox 2009, pp. 95–102. ACM Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kallio, K.P., Mäyrä, F., Kaipainen, K.: At Least Nine Ways to Play: Approaching Gamer Mentalities. Games and Culture 6(4), 327–353 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koivisto, E.M.I., Korhonen, H.: Mobile Game Playability Heuristics (2006), www.forum.nokia.com

  9. Korhonen, H.: Comparison of Playtesting and Expert Review Methods in Mobile Game Evaluation. In: Fun and Games 2010 Conference, pp. 18–27. ACM Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Korhonen, H.: The Explanatory Power of Playability Heuristics. In: ACE 2011. ACM Press (2011), article no. 40

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E.M.I.: Playability Heuristics for Mobile Game. In: MobileHCI, pp. 9–16. ACM Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E.M.I.: Playability Heuristics for Mobile Multi-player Games. In: DIMEA, pp. 28–35. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuchera, B.: SimCity Social is a collection of dirty tricks pretending to be game play. The Penny Arcade Report (2012), http://penny-arcade.com/report/editorial-article/simcity-social-is-a-collection-of-dirty-tricks-pretending-to-be-game-play.php

  14. Kultima, A.: Casual Game Design Values. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. ACM, Tampere (2009), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621841.1621854

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ling, C., Salvendy, G.: Effect of Evaluators’ Cognitive Style on Heuristic Evaluation: Field Dependent and Field Independent Evaluators. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(4), 382–393 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luban, P.: The Design of Free-To-Play Games: Part 1. Gamasutra Online Magazine (2010), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/6552/the_design_of_freetoplay_games_.php?print=1

  17. Paavilainen, J., Korhonen, H., Saarenpää, H.: Comparing Two Playability Heuristic Sets with Expert Review Method: A Case Study of Mobile Game Evaluation. In: Lugmayr, A., et al. (eds.) Media in the Ubiquitous Era: Ambient, Social and Gaming Media, pp. 29–52. IGI Global (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paavilainen, J.: Critical Review on Video Game Evaluation Heuristics: Social Games Perspective. In: FuturePlay 2010, pp. 56–65. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palmer, D.E.: Pop-Ups, Cookies, and Spam: Toward a Deeper Analysis of the Ethical Significance of Internet Marketing Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 58, 271–280 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T.: Heuristic Evaluation for Games: Usability Principles for Video Game Design. In: CHI 2008, pp. 1453–1462 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinelle, D., Wong, N., Stach, T., Gutwin, C.: Usability Heuristics for Networked Multiplayer Games. In: GROUP 2009, pp. 169–178 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer, N.: Heuristic Evaluation of Games. In: Isbister, K., Schaffer, N. (eds.) Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience, pp. 79–89. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheffield, B.: Gamelab 2011: MUD Creator Bartle: ’Current Social Games Are Not Fun’. Gamasutra Online Magazine (2011), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/35551/Gamelab_2011_MUD_Creator_Bartle_Current_Social_Games_Are_Not_Fun.php

  24. Steinberg, S.: Social Games: 5 Growing Threats to Watch, Industry Gamers Exclusive (2011), http://www.industrygamers.com/news/social-games-5-growing-threats-to-watch

  25. Tyni, H., Sotamaa, O., Toivonen, S.: Howdy Pardner!: On Free-to-play, Sociability and Rhythm Design in FrontierVille. In: MindTrek 2011. ACM Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. van Meurs, R.L.M.: And Then You Wait: The Issue of Dead Time in Social Network Games. In: DIGRA 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ventrice, T.: Building the Foundation of a Social Future (2009), http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4210/building_the_foundation_of_a_.php

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paavilainen, J., Alha, K., Korhonen, H. (2012). Exploring Playability of Social Network Games. In: Nijholt, A., Romão, T., Reidsma, D. (eds) Advances in Computer Entertainment. ACE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7624. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34292-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34292-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34291-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34292-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics