Skip to main content

An Axiomatic Model for Merging Stratified Belief Bases by Negotiation

  • Conference paper
Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications (ICCCI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7653))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents an axiomatic model for merging stratified belief bases by negotiation. We introduce the concept of mapping solution, which maps the preferences of agents into layers, as a vehicle to represent the belief states of agents and their attitudes towards the negotiation situations. The belief merging process in our model is divided into two stages: in the first stage, the agents’ stratified belief bases are maped to their preferences, and in the second stage a negotiation between the agents is carried out based on these preferences. In this paper, a set of rational axioms for negotiation-based belief merging is proposed and a negotiation solution which satisfies the proposed axioms is introduced. Finally, the logical properties of a family of merging-by-negotiation operators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abidi, M.A., Gonzalez, R.C.: Data fusion in robotics and machine intelligence. Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R.A., Ribeiro-Neto, B.A.: Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In: Bajcsy, R. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 640–647. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Possibilistic merging and distance-based fusion of propositional information. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34, 217–252 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Booth, R.: A negotiation-style framework for non-prioritised revision. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2001, pp. 137–150. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Booth, R.: Social contraction and belief negotiation. Inf. Fusion 7, 19–34 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewka, G.: A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In: de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L. (eds.) ECAI, pp. 303–307. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danilowicz, C., Nguyen, N.T.: Consensus-based partitions in the space of ordered partitions. Pattern Recognition 21(3), 269–273 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. de Amo, S., Carnielli, W.A., Marcos, J.: A Logical Framework for Integrating Inconsistent Information in Multiple Databases. In: Eiter, T., Schewe, K.-D. (eds.) FoIKS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2284, pp. 67–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Konieczny, S.: Belief base merging as a game. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(3), 275–294 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Da2 merging operators. Artif. Intell. 157, 49–79 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Konieczny, S., Pérez, R.P.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773–808 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Levi, I.: Subjunctives, dispositions and chances. Synthese 34, 423–455 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lew, M.S., Sebe, N., Djeraba, C., Jain, R.: Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State of the art and challenges. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 2(1), 1–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artif. Intell. 83, 363–378 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nash, J.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2), 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, N.T.: A method for ontology conflict resolution and integration on relation level. Cybernetics and Systems 38(8), 781–797 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, N.T.: Inconsistency of knowledge and collective intelligence. Cybernetics and Systems 39(6), 542–562 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J.A., Murray, R.M.: Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 95(1), 215–233 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pattichis, C.S., Pattichis, M.S., Micheli-Tzanakou, E.: Medical imaging fusion applications: An overview. In: ACSSC, vol. 2, pp. 1263–1267 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: Merging stratified knowledge bases under constraints. In: AAAI, pp. 281–286 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ren, W., Beard, R., Atkins, E.: A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 3, pp. 1859–1864 (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of arbitration. International Journal of Algebra and Computation 7, 133–160 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Serra, J.: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sliwko, L., Nguyen, N.T.: Using multi-agent systems and consensus methods for information retrieval in internet. International Journal of Intelligent Information and Database Systems (IJIIDS) 1(2), 181–198 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tran, T.H., Nguyen, N.T., Vo, Q.B.: Axiomatic characterization of belief merging by negotiation. Multimedia Tools and Applications (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, D.: A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining. Artif. Intell. 174, 1307–1322 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tran, T.H., Vo, Q.B. (2012). An Axiomatic Model for Merging Stratified Belief Bases by Negotiation. In: Nguyen, NT., Hoang, K., JČ©drzejowicz, P. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34630-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34630-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34629-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34630-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics