Skip to main content

Municipalities and Sustainable Tourism: Challenges, Requirements and Added Value

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVENG))

Abstract

Municipalities as well as companies are currently addressed by their stakeholders to report their (environmental, social and economic) impacts. If municipalities are following the ideas of the Agenda 21, that are based on the results of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro (1992) when focusing on sustainable tourism, they are facing a gap due to missing indicators focusing on topics in the field of sustainable tourism and boundaries of the sustainability report. The analyzed sustainability reporting guidelines, such as the Global Reporting Initiative 3.1 or the United Nations Global Compact, lack to support municipalities due to missing indicators and support in defining the sustainability report’s boundaries. This chapter will indicate challenges, requirements and added value for municipalities with respect to sustainable tourism, by extending current sustainability guidelines based on a literature analysis and interviews done in the project “Next Generation CEMIS for Environmental, Energy and Resource Management” (IT-for-Green).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sustainable business institute; Deutsches Aktieninstitut (2011) Nachhaltigkeit gewinnt für Emittenten weiter an Bedeutung. Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borgstedt S, Christ T, Reusswig F (2010) Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2010. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage, Niestetal

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Manage Rev 36(2):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conference on environment and development (1999) Agenda 21, programme of action for sustainable development; Rio declaration on environment and development; statement of forest principles; the final text of agreements negotiated by governments at the United Nations conference on environment and development (UNCED), 3–14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Department of Public Information United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. Global reporting initiative guidelines (2002) Sustainability REPORTING Guidelines 2002, Amsterdam. Retrieved from: http://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf, accessed 2013-01-13

  6. European commission (2001) Grünbuch Europäische Rahmenbedingungen für die soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen. KOM 366 final, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leipziger D (2010) The corporate responsibility code book, Rev 2 (ed.) Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  8. United Nations (2000) United Nations global compact. Retrieved from: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/index.html, accessed 2013-01-13

  9. International labour organization (ILO) (2013) Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf, accessed 2013-01-14

  10. Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz, Agenda-Büro, Städtetag Baden-Württemberg, Gemeindetag Baden-Württemberg. 2004. Arbeitsmaterialie 36: Kommunale Umwelt-Indikatoren—Ergänzungen zum Leitfaden: Indikatoren im Rahmen einer Lokalen Agenda 21

    Google Scholar 

  11. International organization for standardization (2011) ISO 26000—Schematic overview. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/sr_schematic-overview.pdf, accessed 2013-01-13

  12. Umweltministerium Baden-Würtenberg, Bayerischen Staatsministerium für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz, Hessischen Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz, Thüringer Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Naturschutz und Umwelt, Forschungsstätte der evangelischen Studiengemeinschaft. 2009. Leitfaden Indikatoren im Rahmen einer Lokalen Agenda 21, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  13. Promberger K, Voraber A, Steinlechner M (2013) Der Tiroler Nachhaltigkeits-Check. Retrieved from: http://www.verwaltungsmanagement.at/onlinecheck/einleitung.php, accessed 2013-06-26

  14. Ladenburg (2007) Nachhaltigkeitsbericht der Stadt Ladenburg. Retrieved from: www.ladenburg.de/pdf/nachhaltigkeitsbericht.pdf, accessed: 2013-01-13

  15. Deutsche Bahn (2013) 100 Prozent erneuerbare Energien bis 2050. Retrieved from: http://www.deutschebahn.com/de/nachhaltigkeit/oekologie/klimaschutz/erneuerbare_energien/db_un_erneuerbare_energien.html, accessed 2013-04-29

  16. Isenmann R, Marx Gómez J (2008) Einführung in die internetgestützte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. In: Isenmann R, Marx Gómez J (eds). Internetbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. Maßgeschneiderte Stakeholder-Kommunikation mit IT. Schmidt, 13–35, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bey C (2008) Beitrag zur Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung zum nachhaltigen Unternehmen. In: Isenmann R, Marx Gómez J (eds). Internetbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. Maßgeschneiderte Stakeholder-Kommunikation mit IT. Schmidt, 37–49, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundie S, Lenzen M (2008) Quantitative Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung ohne Systemgrenzen. In: Isenmann R, Marx Gómez J (eds) Internetbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. Maßgeschneiderte Stakeholder-Kommunikation mit IT. Schmidt, 99–111, Schmidt

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solsbach A, Marx Gómez J, Isenmann R (2011) ISTORM—Idea and reference architecture approaching inter-organisational sustainability reporting. In: Pillmann W, Schade S, Smits P (eds) EnviroInfo ISPRA 2011—Proceedings of the 25th international conference environmental informatics, 5—7th October. Ispra, Italy. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 639–646

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the project IT-for-Green (Next Generation CEMIS for Environmental, Energy and Resource Management). The IT-for-Green project is funded by the European regional development fund (grant number W/A III 80119242). The authors thank for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Solsbach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Solsbach, A., Rapp, B. (2014). Municipalities and Sustainable Tourism: Challenges, Requirements and Added Value. In: Funk, B., Niemeyer, P., Gómez, J. (eds) Information Technology in Environmental Engineering. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36011-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics