Skip to main content

Prediction of Relevance between Requests and Web Services Using ANN and LR Models

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7803))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2152 Accesses

Abstract

An approach of Web service matching is proposed in this paper. It adopts semantic similarity measuring techniques to calculate the matching level between a pair of service descriptions. Their similarity is then specified by a numeric value. Determining a threshold for this value is a challenge in all similar matching approaches. To address this challenge, we propose the use of classification methods to predict the relevance of requests and Web services. In recent years, outcome prediction models using Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network have been developed in many research areas. We compare the performance of these methods on the OWLS-TC v3 service library. The classification accuracy is used to measure the performance of the methods. The experimental results show the efficiency of both methods in predicting the new cases. However, Artificial Neural Network with sensitivity analysis model outperforms Logistic Regression method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Web Services Architecture Requirements, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsa-reqs/

  2. Web Services Architecture, http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/

  3. Mohebbi, K., Ibrahim, S., Idris, N.B., Tabatabaei, S.G.H.: A Guideline for Evaluating Semantic Web Service Discovery Approaches. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences (AISS) 4, 330–346 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness. Computational Linguistics 32, 13–47 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsatsaronis, G., Varlamis, I., Vazirgiannis, M.: Text Relatedness Based on a Word Thesaurus. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37, 1–39 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Batet, M., Sánchez, D., Valls, A.: Deliverable D3: State of the art of clustering algorithms and semantic similarity measures (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S.: Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burns, R., Burns, R.: Logistic Regression. Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS, pp. 568-588. SAGE Publications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N.H., Halim, H.A., Zainal, S.R.M., Lo, M.C.: Discriminant analysis: An illustrated example. African Journal of Business Management 4, 1654–1667 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alkarkhi, A.F.M., Easa, A.M.: Comparing Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression Model as a Statistical Assessment Tools of Arsenic and Heavy Metal Contents in Cockles. Journal of Sustainable Development 1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Antonogeorgos, G., Panagiotakos, D.B., Priftis, K.N., Tzonou, A.: Logistic Regression and Linear Discriminant Analyses in Evaluating Factors Associated with Asthma Prevalence among 10- to 12-Years-Old Children: Divergence and Similarity of the Two Statistical Methods. International Journal of Pediatrics 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dattalo, P.: A Comparison of Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression. Journal of Social Service Research 19, 121–144 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, C., Wechsler, H.: Gabor Feature Based Classification Using the Enhanced Fisher Linear Discriminant Model for Face Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 11, 467–476 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kazemnejad, A., Batvandi, Z., Faradmal, J.: Comparison of artificial neural network and binary logistic regression for determination of impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 16, 615–620 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terrin, N., Schmid, C., Griffith, J., D’Agostino, R., Selker, H.: External validity of predictive models: A comparison of logistic regression, classification trees, and neural networks. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 721–729 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patterson, D.: Artificial Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerny, P.A.: Data mining and Neural Networks from a Commercial Perspective. In: 36th Annual ORSNZ Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raghavendra, B.K., Srivatsa, S.K.: Evaluation of Logistic Regression and Neural Network Model With Sensitivity Analysis on Medical Datasets. International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS) 5, 503–511 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baxt, W.: Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet, 1135–1138 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eftekhar, B., Mohammad, K., Ardebili, H.E., Ghodsi, M., Ketabchi, E.: Comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression models for prediction of mortality in head trauma based on initial clinical data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leondes, C.: Neural network systems, techniques, and applications. Academic Press, San Diego (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Song, J.H., Venkatesh, S.S., Conant, E.A., Arger, P.H., Sehgal, C.M.: Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses. Academic Radiology 12, 487–495 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klusch, M.: The S3 Contest: Performance Evaluation of semantic web services. In: Blake, M.B., Cabral, L., König-Ries, B., Küster, U., Martin, D. (eds.) Semantic Web Services: Advancement through Evaluation. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. English Relevance Judgements, http://trec.nist.gov/data/reljudge_eng.html

  26. Swets, J.: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bishop, C.: Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohebbi, K., Ibrahim, S., Idris, N.B. (2013). Prediction of Relevance between Requests and Web Services Using ANN and LR Models. In: Selamat, A., Nguyen, N.T., Haron, H. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36543-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36543-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36542-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36543-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics