Skip to main content

Determining the Collaboration Maturity of Organizational Teams: A Study in the Automotive Industry

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2011)

Abstract

Many researchers argue that the quality of collaboration directly affects the quality of an organization’s outcomes and performance. This paper reports on the first field application of a Collaboration Maturity Model (Col-MM) through an automotive field study. This model was empirically developed during a series of Focus Group meetings with professional collaboration experts to maximize its relevance and practical applicability. Col-MM is intended to be sufficiently generic to be applied to any type of collaboration and useable to assess the collaboration maturity of a given team holistically through self-assessments performed by practitioners. The purpose of the study reported in this paper was to apply and evaluate the use of the Col-MM in practice. The results should be of interest to academic researchers and information systems practitioners interested in collaboration maturity assessment. The paper further serves as a starting point for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banker, R., Bardhan, I., Asdemir, O.: Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Information Systems Research 17, 4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boughzala, I.: Ingénierie de la collaboration: théories, technologies et pratiques, Paris, Hermès (September 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boughzala, I., de Vreede, G.J.: A Collaboration Maturity Model: Development and Exploratory Application. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (January 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Briggs, R.O., Kolfschoten, G.L., de Vreede, G.J., Dean, D.L.: Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering. In: Garcia, I., Trejo, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 121–128 (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P., Voss, C.: Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(2), 105–136 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chudoba, K.M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., Watson-Manheim, M.B.: How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal 15, 279–306 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, K.B., Fujimoto, T.: Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crosby, P.B.: Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damianos, L., Hirschman, L., Kozierok, R., Kurtz, J., Greenberg, A., Holgado, R., Walls, K., Laskowski, S., Scholtz, J.: Evaluation for Collaborative Systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 31(2), Article 15 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daoudi, J., Bourgault, M.: What Do We Know About Collaborative Maturity? In: 4th Annual Sprott Doctoral Symposium, April 19-20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Den Hengst, M., Kolfschoten, G., Dean, D.L., Chakrapani, A.: Assessing the quality of collaborative processes. In: Proceeding of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dooley, K., Subra, A., Anderson, J.: Maturity and its Impact on New Product Development Project Performance. Research in Engineering Design 13, 30–29 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fraser, P., Farrukh, C., Gregory, M.: Managing product development collaborations – A process maturity approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 217(11), 1499–1519 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Gregory, M.: The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. In: IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Cambridge, August 19-20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fraser, P., Moultrie, J., Holdway, R.: Exploratory studies of a proposed design maturity model. In: 8th International Product Development Management Conference, University of Twente, Holland, June 11-12 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frost, Sullivan: Meetings Around the World: The Impact of Collaboration on Business Performance, White paper (2007), http://newscenter.verizon.com/kit/collaboration/MAW_WP.pdf (last accessed: April 3, 2011)

  18. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N.: How to build collaborative advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review 46(1), 22–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harter, D.E., Krishman, M.S., Slaughter, S.A.: Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development. Management Science 46(4), 451–466 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herskovic, V., Pino, J.A., Ochoa, S.F., Antunes, P.: Evaluation Methods for Groupware Systems. In: Haake, J.M., Ochoa, S.F., Cechich, A. (eds.) CRIWG 2007. LNCS, vol. 4715, pp. 328–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh, P.J., Lin, B., Lin, C.: The Construction and Application of Knowledge Navigator Model (KNM TM): The Evaluation of Knowledge Management Maturity. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4087–4100 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jordan, M.H., Field, H.S., Armenakis, A.A.: The relationship of group process variables and team performance—A team-level analysis in a field setting. Small Group Research 33, 121–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lebrun, J., Gosset, P., Pallot, M., Roux, P., Gandelot, D., Vannier, M.: FREE Capability Assessment Framework (FREE-CAF), Vol. 1: Overview, Deliverable 132-1, ESPRIT Project 23286 FREE (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Levan, S.K.: Travail collaboratif sur Internet: Concept, méthodes et pratiques des plateaux projet. Vuibert, Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Macbeth, D., Ferguson, N.: Partnership sourcing: an integrated supply chain management approach. Pitman Publishing, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martins, L.L., Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T.: Virtual teams: what do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management 30(6), 805–835 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. McGrath, M.E. (ed.): Setting the PACE in Product Development: A Guide to Product and Cycle-Time Excellence. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mintzberg, H.: The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., Weber, C.: Capability maturity model for software, Version 1.1.Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-024 ESC-TR-93-177 (February 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C.: Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 10(4), 281–311 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinsonneault, A., Kraemer, K.L.: Middle management downsizing: An empirical investigation of the impact of information technology. Management Science 43(5), 659–679 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramasubbu, N., Krishnan, M.S., Kompalli, P.: A process maturity framework for managing distributed development. IEEE Software, 80–86 (May/June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sander, P.C., Brombacher, A.C.: Analysis of quality information flows in the product creation process of high-volume consumer products. International Journal of Production Economics 67(1), 37–52 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boughzala, I., de Vreede, GJ. (2013). Determining the Collaboration Maturity of Organizational Teams: A Study in the Automotive Industry. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 348. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37186-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37185-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37186-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics