Skip to main content

Situational Awareness for Improving Network Resilience Management

  • Conference paper
Information Security Practice and Experience (ISPEC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7863))

Abstract

Computer networks, widely used by enterprises and individuals nowadays, are still vulnerable when facing traffic injection, human mistakes, malicious attacks and other failures though we spend much more time and cost on security, dependability, performability, survivability, and risk assessment to make the network provide resilient services. This is because these measures are commonly viewed as closely related but a practical means of linking them is often not achieved. Network resilience research brings together all the planning that the network can be managed at a holistic view of resilience management. This paper focuses on network resilience management from “reactive” paradigm to a “proactive” one through Situational Awareness (SA) of internal factors of network and external ones of complex, dynamic and heterogeneous network environment. After surveying the research of network resilience and resilience assessment in the network, we give a model to discuss how to construct awareness of resilience issues which includes four stages. The first step is to get the situational elements about what we are interested in. Second, to understand what happened and what is going on in the networks, pattern learning and pattern matching are exploited to identify challenge. Then, to make proactive resilience management, we need to predict challenges and look for potential ones at this stage. At the fourth stage, resilience management can help take actions of remediation and recovery according to the policy of defender and attacker. After that, the two players’ behaviors of defender and attacker are modeled in the same model by using Extended Generalized Stochastic Game Nets (EGSGN) which combines Game theory into Stochastic Petri Nets. Finally, we give a case study to show how to use EGSGN to depict the network resilience situation in the same model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Madni, A.M., Jackson, S.: Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Systems Journal 3(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sterbenz, J.P.G., Hutchison, D., Cetinkaya, E.K., et al.: Resilience and Survivability in Communication Network: Strategies, Principles, and Survey and Disciplines. Computer Networks 54, 1245–1265 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, P., Scholler, M., Fessi, A., et al.: Network Resilience: A Systematic Approach. Submitted to IEEE Communication (December 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Najjar, W., Gaudiot, J.: Network resilience: A measure of fault tolerance. IEEE Trans. Comput. 39(2), 174–181 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph, D., Franks, J.K., Freeman, C.N., et al.: Reliable and Resilient End-to-End Connectivity for Heterogeneous Networks. US 2011/0038256 A1 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cholda, P., Mykkltveit, A., et al.: A survey of resilience differentiation frameworks in communication network. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 9(4) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menth, M., Duelli, M., Martin, R., Milbrandt, J.: Resilience analysis of packet-witched communication networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keralapura, R., Moerschell, A., Chuah, C.N., et al.: A Case for Using Service Availability to Characterize IP Backbone Topologies. Journal of Communications and Networks 8(2) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haider, A., Harris, R.: Recovery Techniques in Next Generation Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 9(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sousa, B., Pentikousis, K., Curado, M.: REF: Resilience Evaluation Framework. In: 2010 International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schaeffer-Filho, A., Smith, P., Mauthe, A., Hutchison, D., Yu, Y., Fry, M.: A Framework for the Design and Evaluation of Network Resilience Management. In: 13th IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cholda, P., Tapolcai, J., Cinkler, T., et al.: Quality of Resilience as a Network Reliability Characterization Tool. IEEE Network (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Autenrieth, A.: Differentiated Resilience in IP-Based Multilayer Transport Networks. Ph.D. dissertation. Technische University Munchen, Munchen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bursztein, E., Goubault-Larrecq, J.: A Logical Framework for Evaluating Network Resilience against Faults and Attacks. In: Cervesato, I. (ed.) ASIAN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4846, pp. 212–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sterbenz, J.P.G., Cetinkaya, E.K., Hameed, M.A., et al.: Evaluation of, Network Resilience, Survivability and Disruption Tolerance: Analysis, Topology Generation, Simulation and Experimentation. Springer Telecommunication Systems Journal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dove, R.: Patterns of Self-Organizing Agile Security for Resilient Network Situational Awareness and Sensemaking. In: 8th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mayron, L.M., Bahr, G.S., et al.: A Hybrid Cognitive- Neurophysiological Approach to Resilient Cyber Security. In: The 2010 Militay Communicatons Conference – Cyber Security and Network Management (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors Journal 37(1), 32–64 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bass, T.: Intrusion systems and multisensor data fusion: Creating cyberspace situational awareness. Communications of the ACM 43(4), 99–105 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, G., Shen, D., et al.: Game Theoretic Approach to Threat Prediction and Situation Awareness. Journal of Advances in Information Fusion 2(1) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, M., Hutchison, D.: Towards Resilient Networks Using Situation Awareness. In: The 12th Annual Post Graduate Symposium on the Convergence of Telecommunications, Networking and Broadcasting (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaeffer-Filho, A., Smith, P., Mauthe, A.: Policy-driven Network Simulation: a Resilience Case Study. In: SAC 2011, March 21-25 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhai, Y., Ning, P., Iyer, P., et al.: Reasoning About Complementary Intrusion Evidence. In: Proceedings of 20th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steinder, M., Sethi, A.S.: Probabilistic Fault Localization in Communication Systems Using Belief Networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 12(5) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michael, F., Mathias, F., Paul, S., David, H.: Challenge Identification for Network Resilience. In: 2010 6th EURO-NF Conference on Next Generation Internet (NGI) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moitra, S.D., Konda, S.L.: The Survivability of Network Systems: An Empirical Analysis. CMU/SEI-2000-TR-021 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sterbenz, J.P.G., Cetinkaya, E.K., Hameed, M.A., et al.: Evaluation of Network Resilience, Survivability and Disruption Tolerance: Analysis, Topology Generation, Simulation and Experimentation. Springer Telecommunication Systems Journal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lin, C., Wang, Y., Wang, Y.: A Stochastic Game Nets Based Approach for Network Security Analysis. In: Proc. of the 29th International Conference on Application and Theory of Petri Nets and other Models of Concurrency, Concurrency Methods: Issues and Applications 2008 Workshop (2008) (invited paper)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zakrzewska, A.N., Ferragut, E.M.: Modeling Cyber Conflicts Using an Extended Petri Net Formalism. In: 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security (CICS) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Imperial College DoC MSc Group And MSc Individual Project, http://pipe2.sourceforge.net/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, M., Feng, T., Smith, P., Hutchison, D. (2013). Situational Awareness for Improving Network Resilience Management. In: Deng, R.H., Feng, T. (eds) Information Security Practice and Experience. ISPEC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7863. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38033-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38033-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38032-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38033-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics