Skip to main content

Designing Autonomous Social Agents under the Adversarial Risk Analysis Framework

  • Conference paper
Highlights on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAMS 2013)

Abstract

We describe how the Adversarial Risk Analysis framework may be used to support the decision making of an autonomous agent which needs to interact with other agents and persons. We propose several contextualizations of the problem and suggest which is the conceptual solution in some of the proposed scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. RĂ¡zuri, J.G., Esteban, P.G., Insua, D.R.: An adversarial risk analysis model for an autonomous imperfect decision agent. In: Guy, T.V., KĂ¡rnĂ½, M., Wolpert, D.H. (eds.) Decision Making and Imperfection. SCI, vol. 474, pp. 165–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ríos Insua, D., Ríos, J., Banks, D.: Adversarial risk analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 104(486), 841–854 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Clemen, R.T., Reilly, T.: Making Hard Decisions with Decision Tools. Duxbury, Pacific Grove (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stahl, D.O., Wilson, P.W.: On players models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), 218–254 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Banks, D., Petralia, F., Wang, S.: Adversarial risk analysis: Borel games. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 27, 72–86 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadane, J.B.: Adversarial risk analysis: What’s new, what isn’t?: Discussion of adversarial risk analysis: Borel games. Journal Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 27(2), 87–88 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadane, J.B., Larkey, P.D.: Subjective probability and the theory of games. Management Science 28(2), 113–120 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Raiffa, H.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. AISoyRobotics (2010), http://www.aisoy.es

  10. Aliprantis, C., Chakrabarti, S.: Games and Decision Making. Oxford University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lippman, S., McCardle, K.: Embedded nash bargaining: Risk aversion and impatience. Decision Analysis 9, 31–41 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoeting, J., Madigan, D., Raftery, A., Volinsky, C.: Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Statistical Science 4, 382–417 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, W., Chellappa, R., Phillips, P.J., Rosenfeld, A.: Face recognition: A literature survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 35(4), 399–458 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hewitt, R.: Seeing With OpenCV, Part 4: Face Recognition With Eigenface (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. RĂ­os Insua, D., Ruggeri, F., Wiper, M.: Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Process Models. Wiley (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Menache, I., Ozdaglar, A.: Network Games: Theory, Models, and Dynamics. Morgan and Claypool Publishers (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Busemeyer, J.R., Dimperio, E., Jessup, R.K.: Integrating emotional processes into decision-making models, pp. 213–229. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loewenstein, G., Lerner, J.S.: The role of affect in decision making. In: Davidson, R., Scherer, K., Goldsmith, H. (eds.) Handbook of Affective Science, pp. 619–642. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R.A., Fehr, E.: Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. Academic Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Picard, R.W.: Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esteban, P.G., Insua, D.R. (2013). Designing Autonomous Social Agents under the Adversarial Risk Analysis Framework. In: Corchado, J.M., et al. Highlights on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. PAAMS 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 365. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38061-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38061-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38060-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38061-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics