Skip to main content

Capacitated Rank-Maximal Matchings

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7878))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider capacitated rank-maximal matchings. Rank-maximal matchings have been considered before and are defined as follows. We are given a bipartite graph \( G= (\mathcal{A} \cup \mathcal{P}, {\cal E})\), in which \(\mathcal{A}\) denotes applicants, \(\mathcal{P}\) posts and edges have ranks – an edge (a,p) has rank i if p belongs to (one of) a’s ith choices. A matching M is called rank-maximal if the largest possible number of applicants is matched in M to their first choice posts and subject to this condition the largest number of appplicants is matched to their second choice posts and so on. We give a combinatorial algorithm for the capacitated version of the rank-maximal matching problem, in which each applicant or post v has capacity b(v). The algorithm runs in \(O(\min(B,C \sqrt{B} ) m)\) time, where C is the maximal rank of an edge in an optimal solution and \(B= \min (\sum_{a \in \mathcal{A}} {b(a)}, \sum_{p \in \mathcal{P}}{b(p)})\) and n, m denote the number of vertices/edges respectively. (B depends on the graph, however it never exceeds m.) The previously known algorithm [11] for this problem has a worse running time of O(Cnmlog(n 2/m) logn) and is not combinatorial –it is based on a weakly polynomial algorithm of Gabow and Tarjan using scaling. To construct the algorithm we use the generalized Gallai-Edmonds decomposition theorem, which we prove in a convenient form for our purposes. As a by-product we obtain a faster (by a factor of \(O(\sqrt{n})\)) algorithm for the Capacitated House Allocation with Ties problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, D.J., Cechlárová, K., Manlove, D.F., Mehlhorn, K.: Pareto Optimality in House Allocation Problems. In: Fleischer, R., Trippen, G. (eds.) ISAAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3341, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham, D.J., Chen, N., Kumar, V., Mirrokni, V.S.: Assignment Problems in Rental Markets. In: Spirakis, P.G., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S.C. (eds.) WINE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4286, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham, D.J., Irving, R.W., Kavitha, T., Mehlhorn, K.: Popular Matchings. SIAM J. Comput. 37(4), 1030–1045 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, C.-C., Kavitha, T., Michail, D., Nasre, M.: Bounded Unpopularity Matchings. Algorithmica 61(3), 738–757 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabow, H.N.: An Efficient Reduction Technique for Degree-Constrained Subgraph and Bidirected Network Flow Problems STOC, pp. 448–456 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Irving, R.W.: Greedy matchings. Technical report TR-2003-136, University of Glasgow (April 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Irving, R.W., Kavitha, T., Mehlhorn, K., Michail, D., Paluch, K.E.: Rank-maximal matchings. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2(4), 602–610 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovasz, L., Plummer, M.D.: Matching Theory. Ann. Discrete Math., vol. 29. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mahdian, M.: Random popular matchings. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 238–242 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manlove, D.F., Sng, C.T.S.: Popular Matchings in the Capacitated House Allocation Problem. In: Azar, Y., Erlebach, T. (eds.) ESA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4168, pp. 492–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehlhorn, K., Michail, D.: Network Problems with Non-Polynomial Weights and Applications (2005) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michail, D.: Reducing rank-maximal to maximum weight matching. Theor. Comput. Sci. 389(1-2), 125–132 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mestre, J.: Weighted Popular Matchings. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 715–726. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Roth, A.E., Postlewaite, A.: Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. J. Math. Econom. 4, 536–546 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paluch, K. (2013). Capacitated Rank-Maximal Matchings. In: Spirakis, P.G., Serna, M. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7878. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38233-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38233-8_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38233-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics