Skip to main content

Formal \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts and Their Induced Implication Rule Systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7880))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Formal concept analysis (FCA) provides an approach to restructuring important lattice structures such as complete lattices, distributive lattices and algebraic lattices. In this paper, we focus on the theoretical aspect of FCA and study the representation of algebraic domains by a special type of formal contexts. We first propose the notion of consistent \(\mathcal{F}\)-context and investigate the detailed properties. Then we study the induced implication rule systems of the consistent \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts and propose the notion of formal implication rule systems as the axiomatization. The results show that \(\mathcal{F}\)-concepts inherent in consistent \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts can be characterized equivalently by closed subsets derived from the formal implication rule systems. Furthermore, we study the order-theoretical properties of \(\mathcal{F}\)-concepts hierarchy (respectively, closed subsets family) of consistent \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts (respectively, formal implication rule system). It is shown that both \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts and formal implication rule systems can serve as appropriate tools to concretely represent algebraic domains.

This work is partly supported by the NSERC Discovery research grants of the third and fourth authors, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2012M521515) of the first author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramsky, S., Jung, A.: Domain theory. In: Abramsky, S., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, vol. 3, pp. 1–168. Clarendon Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bělohlávek, R.: Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 128, 277–298 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to Lattices and Order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dolques, X., Huchard, M., Nebut, C., Saada, H.: Formal and relational concept analysis approaches in software engineering: An overview and an application to learn model transformation patterns in examples. In: The First ICESE Virtual Workshop, Search-based Model-Driven Engineering, Qatar (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faid, M., Missaoui, R., Godin, R.: Knowledge discovery in complex objects. Computational Intelligence 15(1), 28–49 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferré, S., Ridoux, O.: A logical generalization of formal concept analysis. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1867, pp. 371–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganter, B., Kwuida, L.: Dicomplemented lattices: towards a representation theorem. Technical Report, MATH-AL-20-2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganter, B., Kwuida, L.: Representable weak dicomplementations on finite lattices. Contributions to General Algebra 14, J. Heyn, Klagenfurt, 63–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gierz, G., Hofmann, K.H., Keimel, K., Lawson, J.D., Mislove, M., Scott, D.S.: Continuous Lattices and Domains. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, L.K., Huang, F.P., Li, Q.G., Zhang, G.-Q.: Power contexts and their concept lattices. Discrete Mathematics 311, 2049–2063 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartung, G.: A topological representation of lattices. Algebra Universalis 29(2), 273–299 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartung, G.: Sublattices of topologically represented lattices. Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae LXIV(1), 25–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hartung, G., Kamara, M., Săcărea, C.: Topological representation of polarity lattices. Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae LXVIII(1), 49–70 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Zhang, G.-Q.: A categorical view on algebraic lattices in formal concept analysis. Fundamenta Informaticae 74, 1–29 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Huchard, M., Rouane Hacene, M., Roume, C., Valtchev, P.: Relational concept discovery in structured datasets. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 49, 39–76 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kent, R.E.: Rough concept analysis: A synthesis of rough sets and formal concept analysis. Fundamenta Informaticae 27(2), 169–181 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Krajči, S.: A generalized concept lattice. Logic Journal of the IGPL 13(5), 543–550 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwuida, L.: Dicomplemented Lattices: A Contextual Generalization of Boolean Algebras. Shaker (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lai, H., Zhang, D.: Concept lattices of fuzzy contexts: Formal concept analysis vs. rough set theory. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50(5), 695–707 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lei, Y., Luo, M.: Rough concept lattices and domains. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 159, 333–340 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Popescu, A.: A general approach to fuzzy concepts. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50, 265–280 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Valtchev, P., Missaoui, R., Godin, R., Meridji, M.: Generating Frequent Itemsets Incrementally: Two Novel Approaches Based on Galois Lattice Theory. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14, 115–142 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, L.D., Liu, X.D.: Concept analysis via rough set and AFS algebra. Information Sciences 178(21), 4125–4137 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Wille, R.: Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival, I. (ed.) Ordered Sets, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, pp. 445–470 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yao, Y.: A comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis. In: Tsumoto, S., Słowiński, R., Komorowski, J., Grzymała-Busse, J.W. (eds.) RSCTC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3066, pp. 59–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, G.-Q., Shen, G.Q.: Approximable concepts, Chu spaces, and information systems. Theory and Applications of Categories 17(5), 80–102 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guo, L., Li, Q., Valtchev, P., Godin, R. (2013). Formal \(\mathcal{F}\)-contexts and Their Induced Implication Rule Systems. In: Cellier, P., Distel, F., Ganter, B. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. ICFCA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7880. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38317-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38317-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38316-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38317-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics