Skip to main content

Quantitative Aspects of Behaviour Network Verification

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7884))

Abstract

This paper presents quantitative aspects of an approach for the modelling and verification of behaviour networks published previously and describes the application of said modelling technique to a complex coordinating behaviour. In order to decrease the number of interconnection failures in behaviour networks, verification techniques focusing on behaviour interaction can be applied. In previous work, the authors have introduced a novel approach for modelling behaviour networks as networks of finite-state automata, to which model checking can be applied as verification technique. This paper presents how the approach can be used to model complex behaviours and provides calculations of the numbers of states, transitions, and state variables in the resulting automata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armbrust, C., Kiekbusch, L., Ropertz, T., Berns, K.: Verification of behaviour networks using finite-state automata. In: Glimm, B., Krüger, A. (eds.) KI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7526, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Armbrust, C., Kiekbusch, L., Ropertz, T., Berns, K.: Tool-assisted verification of behaviour networks. In: ICRA 2013, Karlsruhe, Germany, May 6-10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Behrmann, G., David, A., Larsen, K.G.: A tutorial on uppaal. In: Bernardo, M., Corradini, F. (eds.) SFM-RT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3185, pp. 200–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eleftherakis, G., Kefalas, P., Sotiriadou, A., Kehris, E.: Modeling biology inspired reactive agents using x-machines. In: Okatan, A. (ed.) International Conference on Computational Intelligence 2004 (ICCI 2004), December 17-19, pp. 93–96. International Computational Intelligence Society, Istanbul (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Faber, J.: Fault tree analysis with Moby/FT. Tech. rep., Department for Computing Science, University of Oldenburg (2005), http://csd.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~jfaber/dl/ToolPresentationMobyFT.pdf

  7. Juurik, S., Vain, J.: Model checking of emergent behaviour properties of robot swarms. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences 60(1), 48–54 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lowry, M., Havelund, K., Penix, J.: Verification and validation of AI systems that control deep-space spacecraft. In: Raś, Z.W., Skowron, A. (eds.) ISMIS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1325, pp. 35–47. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Proetzsch, M.: Development Process for Complex Behavior-Based Robot Control Systems. RRLab Dissertations, Verlag Dr. Hut (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Proetzsch, M., Berns, K., Schuele, T., Schneider, K.: Formal verification of safety behaviours of the outdoor robot ravon. In: Zaytoon, J., Ferrier, J.-L., Andrade-Cetto, J., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICINCO 2007, pp. 157–164. INSTICC Press (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reichardt, M., Föhst, T., Berns, K.: On software quality-motivated design of a real-time framework for complex robot control systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Software Quality and Maintainability (SQM), in conjunction with the 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR) (March 5, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schäfer, A.: Combining real-time model-checking and fault tree analysis. In: Araki, K., Gnesi, S., Mandrioli, D. (eds.) FME 2003. LNCS, vol. 2805, pp. 522–541. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster, M., Fisher, M., Cameron, N., Jump, M.: Model checking and the certification of autonomous unmanned aircraft systems. Tech. Rep. ULCS-11-001, University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Armbrust, C., Ropertz, T., Kiekbusch, L., Berns, K. (2013). Quantitative Aspects of Behaviour Network Verification. In: Zaïane, O.R., Zilles, S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7884. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38457-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38457-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38456-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38457-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics