Skip to main content

Tractable Inference Systems: An Extension with a Deducibility Predicate

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7898))

Abstract

The main contribution of the paper is a PTIME decision procedure for the satisfiability problem in a class of first-order Horn clauses. Our result is an extension of the tractable classes of Horn clauses of Basin & Ganzinger in several respects. For instance, our clauses may contain atomic formulas S ⊢ t where ⊢ is a predicate symbol and S is a finite set of terms instead of a term. ⊢ is used to represent any possible computation of an attacker, given a set of messages S. The class of clauses that we consider encompasses the clauses designed by Bana & Comon-Lundh for security proofs of protocols in a computational model.

Because of the (variadic) ⊢ predicate symbol, we cannot use ordered resolution strategies only, as in Basin & Ganzinger: given S ⊢ t, we must avoid computing S′ ⊢ t for all subsets S′ of S. Instead, we design PTIME entailment procedures for increasingly expressive fragments, such procedures being used as oracles for the next fragment.

Finally, we obtain a PTIME procedure for arbitrary ground clauses and saturated Horn clauses (as in Basin & Ganzinger), together with a particular class of (non saturated) Horn clauses with the ⊢ predicate and constraints (which are necessary to cover the application).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M., Rogaway, P.: Reconciling two views of cryptography (the computational soundness of formal encryption). J. Cryptology 15(2), 103–127 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Backes, M., Pfitzmann, B.: Symmetric encryption in a simulatable Dolev-Yao style cryptographic library. In: 17th IEEE Computer Science Foundations Workshop (CSFW 2004), pp. 204–218 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bana, G., Adao, P., Sakurada, H.: Computationally complete symbolic attacker in action. In: 32nd Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012), pp. 546–560 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bana, G., Comon-Lundh, H.: Towards unconditional soundness: Computationally complete symbolic attacker. In: Degano, P., Guttman, J.D. (eds.) POST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7215, pp. 189–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barthe, G., Grégoire, B., Heraud, S., Béguelin, S.Z.: Computer-aided security proofs for the working cryptographer. In: Rogaway, P. (ed.) CRYPTO 2011. LNCS, vol. 6841, pp. 71–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Basin, D., Ganzinger, H.: Automated complexity analysis based on ordered resolution. J. of the Association of Computing Machinery 48(1), 70–109 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchet, B.: A computationally sound mechanized prover for security protocols. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P 2006), pp. 140–154 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Comon, H., Treinen, R.: The first-order theory of lexicographic path orderings is undecidable. Theoretical Computer Science 176(1-2), 67–87 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Datta, A., Derek, A., Mitchell, J.C., Warinschi, B.: Computationally sound compositional logic for key exchange protocols. In: 19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSF 2006), pp. 321–334 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McAllester, D.: Automatic recognition of tractability in inference relations. Journal of the ACM 40(2) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Micciancio, D., Warinschi, B.: Soundness of formal encryption in the presence of active adversaries. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 133–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nieuwenhuis, R., Rubio, A.: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, chapter Paramodulation-Based Theorem Proving. Elsevier Science and MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Comon-Lundh, H., Cortier, V., Scerri, G. (2013). Tractable Inference Systems: An Extension with a Deducibility Predicate. In: Bonacina, M.P. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-24. CADE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7898. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38574-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38574-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38573-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38574-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics