Skip to main content

How to Use Multiple Graphical Representations to Support Conceptual Learning? Research-Based Principles in the Fractions Tutor

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multiple graphical representations are ubiquitous in educational materials because they serve complementary roles in emphasizing conceptual aspects of the domain. Yet, to benefit robust learning, students have to understand each representation and make connections between them. We describe research-based principles for the use of multiple graphical representations within intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs). These principles are the outcome of a series of iterative classroom experiments with the Fractions Tutor with over 3,000 students. The implementation of these principles into the Fractions Tutor results in robust conceptual learning. To our knowledge, the Fractions Tutor is the first ITS to use multiple graphical representations by implementing research-based principles to support conceptual learning. The instructional design principles we established apply to ITSs across domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. NMAP: Foundations for Success: Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Board Panel. U.S. Government Printing Office (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ainsworth, S.: DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16, 183–198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Sense Making Alone Doesn’t Do It: Fluency Matters Too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 174–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In: Dimitrova, V., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, pp. 441–448. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rau, M.A., Rummel, N., Aleven, V., Pacilio, L., Tunc-Pekkan, Z.: How to schedule multiple graphical representations? A classroom experiment with an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. In: Van Aalst, J. (ed.) The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th ICLS, pp. 64–71. ISLS, Sydney (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: which dimension should we interleave? Learning and Instruction 23, 98–114 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Croock, M.B.M., Van Merrienboër, J.J.G., Paas, F.G.W.C.: High versus low contextual interference in simulation-based training of troubleshooting skills: Effects on transfer performance and invested mental effort. Computers in Human Behavior 14, 249–267 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seufert, T.: Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations. Learning and Instruction 13, 227–237 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Renkl, A.: The worked-out example principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 229–246. Cambridge Univ. Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van der Meij, J., de Jong, T.: Supporting Students’ Learning with Multiple Representations in a Simulation-Based Learning Environment. Learning & Instruction 16, 199–212 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellman, P., Massey, C., Roth, Z., et al.: Perceptual learning and the technology of expertise: studies in fraction learning and algebra. Pragmatics & Cognition 16, 356–405 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N. (2013). How to Use Multiple Graphical Representations to Support Conceptual Learning? Research-Based Principles in the Fractions Tutor. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_107

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_107

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics