Skip to main content

Search-Based Estimation of Problem Difficulty for Humans

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The research question addressed in this paper is: Given a problem, can we automatically predict how difficult the problem will be to solve by humans? We focus our investigation on problems in which the difficulty arises from the combinatorial complexity of problems. We propose a measure of difficulty that is based on modeling the problem solving effort as search among alternatives and the relations among alternative solutions. In experiments in the chess domain, using data obtained from very strong human players, this measure was shown at a high level of statistical significance to be adequate as a genuine measure of difficulty for humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J., Simon, H.: Why are some problems hard? Evidence from tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology 17(2), 248–294 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kenneth Kotovsky, H.A.S.: What makes some problems really hard: Explorations in the problem space of difficulty. Cognitive Psychology 22(2), 143–183 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pizlo, Z., Li, Z.: Solving combinatorial problems: The 15-puzzle. Memory and Cognition 33(6), 1069–1084 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dry, M., Lee, M., Vickers, D., Hughes, P.: Human performance on visually presented traveling salesperson problems with varying numbers of nodes. Journal of Problem Solving 1(1), 20–32 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jarušek, P., Pelánek, R.: Difficulty rating of sokoban puzzle. In: Proc. of the Fifth Starting AI Researchers’ Symposium (STAIRS 2010), pp. 140–150. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pelánek, R.: Difficulty rating of sudoku puzzles by a computational model. In: Proc. of Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2011), pp. 434–439. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guid, M., Bratko, I.: Computer analysis of world chess champions. ICGA Journal 29(2), 65–73 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guid, M., Bratko, I.: Using heuristic-search based engines for estimating human skill at chess. ICGA Journal 34(2), 71–81 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guid, M., Bratko, I. (2013). Search-Based Estimation of Problem Difficulty for Humans. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_131

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_131

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics