Skip to main content

Using Learner Modeling to Determine Effective Conditions of Learning for Optimal Transfer

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Abstract

Semantic network theories of knowledge organization support the idea that recall of organized information depends on how well a learner encodes the connections between the items in the semantic network. However, there is need for more research into what this implies for configuring instruction so that strong semantic network learning is supported with the goal of creating an integrated mental model in the student’s mind. We investigate this question in the context of map learning, where country names are encoded relative to geographic border, internal features, or external features. The main hypothesis was that external features as cues would encourage transfer, since students would practice a network of relationships. The results primarily supported a theory of “cue reinstatement”, where transfer occurred when cues present at learning were present at testing. These effects were analyzed with a mixed effects logistic regression learner model of trial-by-trial learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collins, A.M., Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval Time from Semantic Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–247 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rogers, T.: Computational Models of Semantic Memory. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, pp. 226–267. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.F.: A Spreading-Activation Theory of Semantic Processing. Psychological Review 82, 407–428 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett, F.C.: Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tulving, E., Pearlstone, Z.: Availability Versus Accessibility of Information in Memory for Words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 5, 381–391 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dole, J.A., Sinatra, G.M.: Reconceptualizing Change in the Cognitive Construction of Knowledge. Educational Psychologist 33, 109–128 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb, P.: Constructivism in Mathematics and Science Education. Educational Researcher 23, 4 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chi, M.T.: Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science. In: Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 129–160 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vosniadou, S., Brewer, W.F.: Theories of Knowledge Restructuring in Development. Review of Educational Research 57, 51–67 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., Risko, V.: Teaching Thinking and Content Knowledge: Toward an Integrated Approach. In: Jones, B.F., Idol, L. (eds.) Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Educational Reform, vol. 1, pp. 381–413. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael, A.L., Klee, T., Bransford, J.D., Warren, S.F.: The Transition Form Theory to Therapy: Test of Two Instructional Methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7, 139–153 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. White, B.Y., Frederiksen, J.R.: Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction 16, 3–118 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pavlik Jr., P.I., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B., Koedinger, K.R.: The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) System: A New Tool Linking Cognitive Science with Educators. In: McNamara, D., Trafton, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 397–402. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Central Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/

  16. Draney, K.L., Pirolli, P., Wilson, M.: A Measurement Model for a Complex Cognitive Skill. In: Nichols, P.D., Chipman, S.F., Brennan, R.L. (eds.) Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment, pp. 103–125 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlik Jr., P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance Factors Analysis – A New Alternative to Knowledge Tracing. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, England, pp. 531–538 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 16, 227–265 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Son, J.Y., Smith, L.B., Goldstone, R.L.: Simplicity and Generalization: Short-Cutting Abstraction in Children’s Object Categorizations. Cognition 108, 626 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayer, R.E.: Can Advance Organizers Influence Meaningful Learning? Review of Educational Research 49, 371–383 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maass, J.K., Pavlik, P.I. (2013). Using Learner Modeling to Determine Effective Conditions of Learning for Optimal Transfer. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics