Skip to main content

Differential Impact of Learning Activities Designed to Support Robust Learning in the Genetics Cognitive Tutor

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Abstract

This paper describes two types of Conceptually Grounded Learning Activities designed to foster more robust learning in the Genetics Cognitive Tutor: interleaved worked examples and genetic-process reasoning scaffolds. We report three empirical studies that evaluate the impact of these learning activities on three diverse genetics problem-solving topics in the tutor. We found that interleaved worked examples yielded less basic-skill learning than conventional problem solving, unlike many prior ITS studies of worked examples. We also found preliminary evidence that scaffolded reasoning tasks in conjunction with conventional problem solving leads to more robust understanding than conventional problem solving alone. Implications for the use of contextually grounded learning activities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Cognitive Science 36, 757–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pashler, H., Bain, P., Bottge, B., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., Metcalfe, J.: Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K.: Structuring the Transition from Example Study to Problem Solving in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Cognitive Load Perspective. Educational Psychologist 38, 15–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corbett, A., MacLaren, B., Wagner, A., Kauffman, L., Mitchell, A., Baker, R., Gowda, S.: Preparing Students for Effective Explaining of Worked Examples in the Genetics Cognitive Tutor. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1476–1481. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLaren, B.M., Lim, S.-J., Koedinger, K.R.: When Is Assistance Helpful to Learning? Results in Combining Worked Examples and Intelligent Tutoring. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 677–680. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Reed, S., Corbett, A., Hoffman, B., Wagner, A., MacLaren, B.: Effect of Worked Examples and Cognitive Tutor Training on Constructing Equations. Instructional Science 41, 1–24 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salden, R., Aleven, V., Schwonke, R., Renkl, A.: The Expertise Reversal Effect and Worked Examples in Tutored Problem Solving. Instructional Science 38, 289–307 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Salden, R., Aleven, V.: Effects of Different Ratios of Worked Solution Steps and Problem Solving Opportunities on Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 58–62 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weitz, R., Salden, R.J.C.M., Kim, R.S., Heffernan, N.T.: Comparing worked examples and tutored problem solving: Pure vs. mixed approaches. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2876–2881 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corbett, A., Kauffman, L., MacLaren, B., Wagner, A., Jones, E.: A Cognitive Tutor for Genetics Problem Solving: Learning Gains and Student Modeling. Journal of Educational Computing Research 42, 219–239 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corbett, A., MacLaren, B., Wagner, A., Kauffman, L., Mitchell, A., Baker, R.: Enhancing Robust Learning Through Problem Solving in the Genetics Cognitive Tutor. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corbett, A., MacLaren, B., Wagner, A., Kauffman, L., Mitchell, A., Baker, R.S.J.d. (2013). Differential Impact of Learning Activities Designed to Support Robust Learning in the Genetics Cognitive Tutor. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics