Skip to main content

Complementary Effects of Sense-Making and Fluency-Building Support for Connection Making: A Matter of Sequence?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multiple graphical representations can significantly improve students’ learning. To acquire robust knowledge of the domain, students need to make connections between the different graphical representations. In doing so, students need to engage in two crucial learning processes: sense-making processes to build up conceptual understanding of the connections, and fluency-building processes to fast and effortlessly make use of perceptual properties in making connections. We present an experimental study which contrasts two hypotheses on how these learning processes interact. Does understanding facilitate fluency-building processes, or does fluency enhance sense-making processes? And consequently, which learning process should intelligent tutoring systems support first? Our results based on test data and tutor logs show an advantage for providing support for sense-making processes before fluency-building processes. To enhance students’ robust learning of domain knowledge, ITSs should ensure that students have adequate conceptual understanding of connections between graphical representations before providing fluency-building support for connection making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Schwonke, R., Ertelt, A., Renkl, A.: Fostering the translation between external representations. Does it enhance learning with an intelligent tutoring program? In: Zumbach, J., et al. (eds.) Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence, pp. 117–119. Springer, Netherlands (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Koedinger, K.R.: Toward evidence for instructional design principles: Examples from Cognitive Tutor Math 6. In: 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. ERIC/CSMEE Publications, Athens (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. NMAP: Foundations for Success: Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Board Panel. U.S. Government Printing Office (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charalambous, C.Y., Pitta-Pantazi, D.: Drawing on a Theoretical Model to Study Students’ Understandings of Fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics 64, 293–316 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ainsworth, S.: DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction 16, 183–198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning. Cognitive Science 36, 757–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seufert, T.: Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations. Learning and Instruction 13, 227–237 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., Spada, H.: The Active Integration of Information during Learning with Dynamic and Interactive Visualisations. Learning and Instruction 14, 325–341 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arroyo, I., Royer, J.M., Woolf, B.P.: Using an intelligent tutor and math fluency training to improve math performance. I. J. of AIED 21, 135–152 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kellman, P.J., Massey, C.M., Roth, Z., Burke, T., Zucker, J., Saw, A., Aguero, K., Wise, J.: Perceptual learning and the technology of expertise: Studies in fraction learning and algebra. Pragmatics & Cognition 16, 356–405 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Sense Making Alone Doesn’t Do It: Fluency Matters Too! ITS Support for Robust Learning with Multiple Representations. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 174–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Renkl, A.: The worked-out example principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R. (ed.) Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 229–246. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Gog, T., Paas, F.: Instructional efficiency: revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist 43, 1–11 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Koedinger, K.R., Baker, R., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., Stamper, J.: A data repository for the EDM community: The PSLC Data-Shop. In: Romero, C., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Data Mining, pp. 10–12. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N. (2013). Complementary Effects of Sense-Making and Fluency-Building Support for Connection Making: A Matter of Sequence?. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics