Skip to main content

Time to Change: Deciding When to Switch Action Plans during a Social Interaction

  • Conference paper
Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems (Living Machines 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8064))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Building on the extensive cognitive science literature on the subject, this paper introduces a model of the brain mechanisms underlying social interactions in humans and other primates. The fundamental components of the model are the “Action Observation” and “Action Planning” Systems, dedicated respectively to interpreting/recognizing the partner’s movements and to plan actions suited to achieve certain goals. We have implemented a version of the model including reaching and grasping actions, and tuned on real experimental data coming from human psychophysical studies. The system is able to automatically detect the switching point in which the Action Planning System takes control over the Action Observation System, overriding the automatic imitation behaviour with a complementary social response. With such computational implementation we aim at validating the model and also at endowing an artificial agent with the ability of performing meaningful complementary responses to observed actions in social scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becchio, C., Manera, V., Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Castiello, U.: Grasping intentions: from thought experiments to empirical evidence. Front Hum. Neurosci. 6, 117 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakemore, S.-J., Frith, C.: The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 43(2), 260–267 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G.R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R.J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., Freund, H.J.: Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fmri study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13(2), 400–404 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cattaneo, L., Barchiesi, G., Tabarelli, D., Arfeller, C., Sato, M., Glenberg, A.M.: One’s motor performance predictably modulates the understanding of others’ actions through adaptation of premotor visuo-motor neurons. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. 6(3), 301–310 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chinellato, E., Antonelli, M., Grzyb, B.J., del Pobil, A.P.: Implicit sensorimotor mapping of the peripersonal space by gazing and reaching. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development (2011) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chinellato, E., del Pobil, A.P.: Neural coding in the dorsal visual stream. In: Asada, M., Hallam, J.C.T., Meyer, J.-A., Tani, J. (eds.) SAB 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5040, pp. 230–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chinellato, E., del Pobil, A.P.: The neuroscience of vision-based grasping: a functional review for computational modeling and bio-inspired robotics. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 8(2), 223–254 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costantini, M., Committeri, G., Sinigaglia, C.: Ready both to your and to my hands: mapping the action space of others. PLoS One 6(4), e17923 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Culham, J.C., Valyear, K.F.: Human parietal cortex in action 16(2), 205–212 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demiris, Y., Khadhouri, B.: Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54, 361–369 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabbri-Destro, M., Rizzolatti, G.: Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology (Bethesda) 23, 171–179 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Olivier, E.: Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. 15(2), 213–218 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heyes, C.: Automatic imitation. Psychol. Bull. 137(3), 463–483 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, P.L., Meltzoff, A.N., Decety, J.: Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage 31(1), 429–439 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jastorff, J., Begliomini, C., Fabbri-Destro, M., Rizzolatti, G., Orban, G.A.: Coding observed motor acts: different organizational principles in the parietal and premotor cortex of humans. J. Neurophysiol. 104(1), 128–140 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A.D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., Fried, I.: Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr. Biol. 20(8), 750–756 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ognibene, D., Chinellato, E., Sarabia, M., Demiris, Y.: Towards contextual action recognition and target localization with active allocation of attention. In: Prescott, T.J., Lepora, N.F., Mura, A., Verschure, P.F.M.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2012. LNCS, vol. 7375, pp. 192–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Sartori, L., Bucchioni, G., Castiello, U.: When emulation becomes reciprocity. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. (May 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., Castiello, U.: From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions. Soc. Neurosci. 7(2), 146–158 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Spunt, R.P., Lieberman, M.D.: The busy social brain: evidence for automaticity and control in the neural systems supporting social cognition and action understanding. Psychol. Sci. 24(1), 80–86 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, M., Knoblich, G.: The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol. Bull. 131(3), 460–473 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolpert, D.M., Doya, K., Kawato, M.: A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358(1431), 593–602 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chinellato, E., Ognibene, D., Sartori, L., Demiris, Y. (2013). Time to Change: Deciding When to Switch Action Plans during a Social Interaction. In: Lepora, N.F., Mura, A., Krapp, H.G., Verschure, P.F.M.J., Prescott, T.J. (eds) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8064. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39802-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39802-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39801-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39802-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics