Abstract
During a process of spatial planning multiple actors meet in a decision making process trying to satisfy as much as possible their individual desires and goals. Diffusion of opinions is considered an important factor in this process. A behavioural approach that represent the diffusion and distribution of opinions are absent in most spatial ABMs. This research presents a novel approach to simulating spatial opinions dynamics based on an agent based implementation of the Deffuant Weisbuch model. The model explicitly deals with spatial heterogeneity in opinions as well as heterogeneity in the willingness of agents to adapt their opinions. The model is demonstrated for a hypothetical spatial allocation problem in a study area in the south-east of the Netherlands. Three different scenarios representing different levels of willingness to cooperate within the population of agents are worked out. The results showed that explicit spatial opinion patterns can be simulated which are in line with what would be expected from the scenarios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rogers, E.: Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York (2003)
Strang, D., Soule, S.A.: Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 265–290 (1998); ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: 1998 / Copyright 1998 Annual Reviews
Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., Wakolbinger, L.: Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Central European Journal of Operations Research 20, 183–230 (2012)
Hagerstrand, T.: Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. [s.n.], Chicago (1967); Monograph Wageningen UR Library
Berger, T.: Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: A simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes, and policy analysis. Agricultural Economics 25(2-3), 245–260 (2001)
Parker, C., Manson, S., Janssen, M., Hoffmann, M., Deadman, P.: Multi-agent system models for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, 316–340 (2003)
Matthews, R., Gilbert, N., Roach, A., Polhill, J., Gotts, N.: Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landscape Ecology 22, 1447–1459 (2007), doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1
Latane, B.: The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist 36, 343 (1981)
Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3, 87–98 (2000)
Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics. In: Cowan, R., Jonard, N. (eds.) Heterogenous Agents, Interactions and Economic Performance. LNEMS, vol. 521, pp. 225–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C 18, 1819–1838 (2007)
Lorenz, J.: Consensus strikes back in the hegselmann-krause model of continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (2006)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Computational Economics 25, 381–405 (2005)
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (2002)
Martins, A.: Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems. International Journal of Modern Physics C 19 (2007)
Martins, A.: Bayesian updating rules in continuous opinion dynamics models. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2009, P02017 (2009)
Delre, S.A., Jager, W., Bijmolt, T.H.A., Janssen, M.A.: Will it spread or not? the effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27, 267–282 (2010)
Salzarulo, L.: A continuous opinion dynamics model based on the principle of meta-contrast. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9 (2006)
Martins, A., Pereira, C., Vicente, R.: An opinion dynamics model for the diffusion of innovations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388, 3225–3232 (2009)
Ligtenberg, A., Wachowicz, M., Bregt, A.K., Beulens, A., Kettenis, D.: Design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 43–55 (2004)
Ligtenberg, A., Beulens, A., Kettenis, D., Bregt, A.K., Wachowicz, M.: Simulating knowledge sharing in spatial planning: an agent-based approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (2009) (advance online publication)
Leenders, R.T.A.J.: Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24, 21–47 (2002)
Van der Horst, D.: Nimby or not? exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35, 2705–2714 (2007)
Dear, M., Taylor, S.M., Hall, G.B.: External effects of mental health facilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70, 342–352 (1980), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01318.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ligtenberg, A., Bregt, A.K. (2014). Simulating Opinion Dynamics in Land Use Planning. In: Kamiński, B., Koloch, G. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39828-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39829-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)