Abstract
Empirical evidence shows that mostly complete and successful processes of innovation diffusion are S-shaped. However, some diffusion processes exhibit a non-perfect S-curve, but show a saddle point, which is displayed as a double-S. The reasons behind this phenomenon have been little studied in the literature. This paper addresses the emergence of the double-S phenomenon in the innovation diffusion process and provides an explanation for it. In order to do that, the authors develop an agent-based simulation model to representing the diffusion of two innovations in a competitive market considering elements of bounded rationality. The results show saddle points appear as a result of three characteristics: (1) the heterogeneity in the population, (2) the presence of asymmetric information and (3) the satisfaction criterion for selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London (1983)
Walton, G.M., Rockoff, H.: History of the American economy. South-Western Pub., Canadá (2010)
Montalvo, C., Kemp, R.: Cleaner technology diffusion: case studies, modeling and policy. Journal of Cleaner Production 6, S1–S6 (2008)
Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: Riding the Saddle: How Cross-Market Communications Can Create a Major Slump in Sales. Journal of Marketing 66, 1–16 (2002)
Tellis, G.J., Chandrasekaran, D.: Getting a Grip on the Saddle: Chasms or Cycles. Working paper series 52, 463–479 (2012)
Bass, A.: new product gowth for model consumer durables. Management Science 15, 215–227 (1969)
Mahajan, V., Muller, E., Bass, F.: New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research. The Journal of Marketing 54, 1–26 (1990)
Goldenberg, J., Efroni, S.: Using cellular automata modeling of the emergence of innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68, 293–308 (2001)
Georgescu, S., Okuda, H.: A Distributed Multi-Agent Framework for Simulating the Diffusion of Innovations. Journal of Power and Energy Systems 2, 1320–1332 (2008)
Peres, R., Muller, E., Mahajan, V.: Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing (2010)
Kiesling, E., Günther, M., Stummer, C., Wakolbinger, L.M.: Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2011)
Berger, T.: Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: a simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes and policy analysis. Agricultural Economics 25, 245–260 (2001)
Rahmandad, H., Sterman, J.: Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science 54, 998–1014 (2008)
Kemp, R., Volpi, M.: The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 21, S14–S21 (2008)
Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99–118 (1955)
Collantes, G.O.: Incorporating stakeholders’ perspectives into models of new technology diffusion: The case of fuel-cell vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74, 267–280 (2007)
Manson, S.M.: Bounded rationality in agent-based models: experiments with evolutionary programs. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20, 991–1012 (2006)
Secchi, D.: Extendable Rationality. Estados Unidos (2011)
Chandrasekaran, D., Tellis, G.J.: A critical review of marketing research on diffusion of new products. Review of Marketing Research, 39–80 (2007)
Golder, P., Tellis, G.J.: Growing, Growing, Gone: Cascades, Diffusion, and Turning Points in the Product Life Cycle. Marketing Science 23, 207–218 (2004)
Willensky, U.: NetLogo. The Center for Connected Learning (CCL) and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University (2012)
Todd, P.M., Gigerenzer, G.: Bounding rationality to the world. Journal of Economic Psychology 24, 143–165 (2003)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Models of the Small World. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cadavid, L., Cardona, C.J.F. (2014). Saddle Points in Innovation Diffusion Curves: An Explanation from Bounded Rationality. In: Kamiński, B., Koloch, G. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39829-2_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39828-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39829-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)