Skip to main content

Reasoning about Choice

  • Conference paper
  • 454 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8068))

Abstract

We present a logic for reasoning about choice. Choice ctl (c-ctl) extends the well-known branching-time temporal logic ctl with choice modalities, “\(\Diamond\)” and “□”. An example c-ctl formula is \(\Diamond\) AF happy, asserting that there exists a choice that will lead to happiness. c-ctl is related to both stit logics and temporal cooperation logics such as atl, but has a much simpler and (we argue) more intuitive syntax and semantics. After presenting the logic, we investigate the properties of the language. We characterise the complexity of the c-ctl model checking problem, investigate some validities, and propose multi-agent extensions to the logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdou, J., Keiding, H.: Effectivity Functions in Social Choice Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Anscombe, G.E.M.: Intention, 2nd edn. Blackwell (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belnap, N., Perloff, M.: Seeing to it that: a canonical form for agentives. Theoria 54, 175–199 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belnap, N., Perloff, M., Xu, M.: Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett, J.: Events and their names. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bratman, M.: Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Broersen, J.: CTL.STIT: enhancing ATL to express important multi-agent system verification properties. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: A STIT-extension of ATL. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 69–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Broersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Embedding Alternating-time Temporal Logic in Strategic STIT Logic of Agency. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(5), 559–578 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Broersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Normal coalition logic and its conformant extension. In: Samet, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), pp. 42–51. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Brussels (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chellas, B.: The Logical Form of Imperatives. Perry Lane Press, Stanford (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chellas, B.F.: On bringing it about. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24(6), 563–571 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, D.: The Logical Form of Action Sentences. In: Rescher, N. (ed.) The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. 81–120. University of Pittsburgh Press (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dennett, D.C.: Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, 68(4) (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and modal logic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science Volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, pp. 996–1072. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, J.-J.C., Wieringa, R.J. (eds.): Deontic Logic in Computer Science — Normative System Specification. John Wiley & Sons (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Müller, T.: On the formal structure of continuous action. In: Schmidt, R., Pratt-Hartmann, I., Reynolds, M. (eds.) AiML-2004: Advances in Modal Logic, pp. 277–286 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pauly, M.: Logic for Social Software. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, ILLC Dissertation Series 2001-10 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schnoebelen, P.: The complexity of temporal logic model checking. In: Balbiani, P., Suzuki, N.-Y., Wolter, F., Zakharyascev, M. (eds.) Advanced in Modal Logic, vol. 4, pp. 393–436. King’s College Publications, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Troquard, N.: Independent agents in branching-time. PhD thesis, Univ. of Toulouse & Univ. of Trento (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Troquard, N., Trypuz, R., Vieu, L.: Towards an ontology of agency and action: From STIT to OntoSTIT+. In: Bennett, B., Fellbaum, C. (eds.) International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 150, pp. 179–190. IOS Press,

    Google Scholar 

  26. van der Hoek, W., Roberts, M., Wooldridge, M.: Social laws in alternating time: Effectiveness, feasibility, and synthesis. Synthese 156(1), 1–19 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of cooperation and propositional control. Artificial Intelligence 64, 81–119 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vendler, Z.: Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66, 143–160 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verkuyl, H.: A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge University Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  30. von Kutschera, F.: Bewirken. Erkenntnis 24(3), 253–281 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. von Wright, G.H.: Norm and Action: A Logical Inquiry. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  32. von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60(237), 1–15 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Hoek, W., Troquard, N., Wooldridge, M. (2013). Reasoning about Choice. In: Chesñevar, C.I., Onaindia, E., Ossowski, S., Vouros, G. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39859-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39860-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics