Skip to main content

Memory Resource Allocation in Top-Down Minimalist Parsing

  • Conference paper
Book cover Formal Grammar (FG 2013, FG 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8036))

Abstract

This paper provides a linking theory between the minimalist grammar formalism and off-line behavioural data. We examine the transient stack states of a top-down parser for Minimalist Grammars as it analyzes embedded sentences in English, Dutch and German. We find that the number of time steps that a derivation tree node persist on the parser’s stack derives the observed contrasts in English center embedding, and the difference between German and Dutch embedding. This particular stack occupancy measure formalizes the leading idea of “memory burden” in a way that links predictive, incremental parsing to specific syntactic analyses.

An anonymous reviewer provided very helpful comments, which have greatly improved the quality of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abney, S., Johnson, M.: Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20(3), 233–249 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach, E., Brown, C., Marslen-Wilson, W.: Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: A psycholinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes 1(4), 249–262 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chomsky, N.: Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomsky, N.: The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Crocker, M.W., Brants, T.: Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(6), 647–669 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, E.: The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In: Miyashita, Y., Marantz, A., O’Neil, W. (eds.) Image, Language, Brain, pp. 95–126. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hale, J.: A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model. In: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hale, J.T.: Grammar, Uncertainty and Sentence Processing. Ph.D. thesis, The Johns Hopkins University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hale, J.T.: Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30, 643–672 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harkema, H.: Parsing Minimalist Languages. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Mental Models. Cambridge University Press (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joshi, A.K.: Processing crossed and nested dependencies: An automation perspective on the psycholinguistic results. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(1), 1–27 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, R.M.: Transient Processing Load in Relative Clauses. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kay, M.: Algorithm schemata and data structures in syntactic processing. In: Grosz, B.J., Jones, K.S., Webber, B.L. (eds.) Readings in Natural Language Processing. Morgan Kaufman (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kayne, R.: The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kobele, G.M.: Formalizing mirror theory. Grammars 5(3), 177–221 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobele, G.M.: Generating Copies: An investigation into structural identity in language and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kobele, G.M.: Importing montagovian dynamics into minimalism. In: Béchet, D., Dikovsky, A. (eds.) Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. LNCS, vol. 7351, pp. 103–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobele, G.M., Retoré, C., Salvati, S.: An automata theoretic approach to minimalism. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10; ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kowalski, R.: Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM 22(7), 424–436 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Levy, R.: Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106, 1126–1177 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis, R.L., Vasishth, S.: An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29, 375–419 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahajan, A.: Word order and (remnant) VP movement. In: Karimi, S. (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling, ch. 10. Blackwell (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mainguy, T.: A probabilistic top-down parser for minimalist grammars. CoRR abs/1010.1826 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Marr, D.: Vision. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marslen-Wilson, W.: Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244, 522–523 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Michaelis, J.: On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Potsdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, G.A., Chomsky, N.: Finitary models of language users. In: Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, ch. 13, pp. 419–491. John Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mönnich, U.: Minimalist syntax, multiple regular tree grammars and direction preserving tree transductions. In: Rogers, J., Kepser, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop Model-Theoretic Syntax at 10; ESSLLI 2007, Dublin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Montague, R.: The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In: Hintikka, J., Moravcsik, J., Suppes, P. (eds.) Approaches to Natural Language, pp. 221–242. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Morawietz, F.: Two-Step Approaches to Natural Language Formalisms, Studies in Generative Grammar, vol. 64. Mouton de Gruyter (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rambow, O., Joshi, A.K.: A processing model for free word order languages. In: Clifton, C., Frazier, L., Rayner, K. (eds.) Perspectives on Sentence Processing, pp. 267–301. Lawrence Erlbaum (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rambow, O., Joshi, A.K.: A processing model for free word order languages. Tech. Rep. IRCS-95-13, University of Pennsylvania (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Resnik, P.: Left-corner parsing and psychological plausibility. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Nantes, France (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shieber, S.M.: Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stabler, E.: Top-down recognizers for MCFGs and MGs. In: Proceedings of CMCL (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stabler, E.P.: Derivational minimalism. In: Retoré, C. (ed.) LACL 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1328, pp. 68–95. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Stabler, E.P., Keenan, E.L.: Structural similarity within and among languages. Theoretical Computer Science 293, 345–363 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Tanenhaus, M., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., Sedivy, J.: Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–1634 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. VanWagenen, S., Brennan, J., Stabler, E.P.: Evaluating parsing strategies in sentence processing. Poster Presented at CUNY 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vasishth, S., Drenhaus, H.: Locality in German. Dialogue and Discourse 1(2), 59–82 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wanner, E., Maratsos, M.: An ATN approach to comprehension. In: Halle, M., Bresnan, J., Miller, G.A. (eds.) Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, ch. 3, pp. 119–161. MIT Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wurmbrand, S.: How complex are complex predicates. Syntax 10(3), 243–288 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobele, G.M., Gerth, S., Hale, J. (2013). Memory Resource Allocation in Top-Down Minimalist Parsing. In: Morrill, G., Nederhof, MJ. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG FG 2013 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39998-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39998-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39997-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39998-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics