Skip to main content

A Unified Test Procedure Designed for Monitoring the Experimental Settings Ensuring Quality Assurance in 3D and Stereoscopic Productions

  • Conference paper
Information Technologies for Performing Arts, Media Access, and Entertainment (ECLAP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7990))

  • 1213 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of an EU co-funded project, the authors have developed a semantically-enabled solution for 3D and stereoscopic film productions process monitoring. This paper describes the method selected to design and deliver a unified procedure to consistently set-up and test the acquisition prototype developed. The underlying idea is that at each development step it will be necessary to verify the improvement (or defects) introduced. Therefore, after the calibration steps, the repetition of a well codified testing procedure based on standard cinematographic practices and comprising most of the usual possible shooting issues was used to achieve comparable results thus improving quality control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 2020 3D Media Spatial Sound and Vision website (2008), http://www.20203dmedia.eu/

  2. Jeffrey, T. (ed.): Film Business – a handbook for producers, 3rd edn. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Case, D.: Film Technology in Post Production, 2nd edn. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Block, B.: The Visual Story – Seeing the Structure of Film, TV, and New Media. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, B., Spohr, S.J.: Guide to Postproduction for TV and Film – managing the Process, 2nd edn. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wyatt, H., Amyes, T.: Audio Post Production for Television and Film – an introduction to technology and techniques, 3rd edn. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Proferes, N.T.: Film Directing Fundamentals – from script to screen. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rea, P.W., Irving, D.K.: Producing & Directing the Short Film and Video. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Honthaner, E.L.: The Complete Film Production Handbook, 3rd edn. Focal Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, G.H.: Video Editing and Post-Production – a professional guide, 4th edn. Focal Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein, S.: Film Production. Focal Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mendiburu, B.: 3D Movie Making – Stereoscopic Digital Cinema from Script to Screen. Focal Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osgood, R.J., Hinshaw, M.J.: Visual Storytelling – Videography and Post Production in the Digital Age. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Musburger, R.B., Kindem, G.: Introduction to Media Production – The Path to Digital Media Production, 4th edn. Focal Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zettl, H.: Television Production Handbook, 5th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katz, E.: The Film Encyclopaedia, 5th edn. Harper Collins, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knox, D.: Strike the Baby and Kill the Blonde: An Insider’s Guide to Film Slang. Three Rivers Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levy, F.: Hollywood 101: The Film Industry. Renaissance Books, Milwaukee (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell, D.: Technical Film and TV for Nontechnical People. Allworth Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Steiff, J.: The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Independent Filmmaking. Alpha Books, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hora, J.: The American Cinematographer Manual (ASC Manual), 9th edn. ASC Holding Corporation, Los Angeles (2007) (vol. 1 - ISBN: 0-935578-31-5, vol. 2 - ISBN: 0-935578-32-3)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rickitt, R.: Special Effects: The History and Technique, 2nd edn. Billboard Books, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brosnan, J.: Movie Magic: The History of Special Effects in the Cinema. Abacus, London (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fielding, R.: Techniques of Special Effects Cinematography. Focal Press, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brinkmann, R.: The Art and Science of Digital Compositing. Morgan Kaufmann, St. Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McClean, S.T.: Digital Storytelling: The Narrative Power of Visual Effects in Film. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cotta Vaz, M., Barron, C.: The Invisible Art: The Legends of Movie Matte Painting. Chronicle Books, San Francisco (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Knight, A.: The Liveliest Art (a Panoramic History of the Movies), Rev. edn. Scribner, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walker, A.: Stanley Kubrick Directs. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dmytryk, E.: On Film Editing: An Introduction to the Art of Film Construction. Focal Press, Oxford (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morales Morante, F.: Teoría y Práctica de la Edición en video. Universidad de San Martin de Porres, Lima (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Murch, W.: In the Blink of an Eye: a Perspective on Film Editing, 2nd rev. edn. Silman-James Press, Los Angeles (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Clevé, B.: Film Production Management. Burlington, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baird, R.N., McDonald, D., Pittman, R.H., Turnbull, A.: The Graphics of Communication: Methods, Media, and Technology, 6th edn. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Orlando (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kristof, R., Satran, A.: Interactivity by Design: Creating and Communicating with New Media. Adobe Press, Mountain View (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knight, C., Glaser, J.: The Graphic Designer’s Guide to Effective Visual Communication for Graphic Designers - Creating Hierarchies with Type, Image and Colour. RotoVision SA, Hove (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ouyang, C., La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Dumas, M., Shortland, K.: Toward Web-Scale Workflows for Film Production. IEEE Internet Computing 12(5), 53–61 (2008), doi:10.1109/MIC.2008.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ouyang, C., La Rosa, M., Redding, G., Prestedge, J.: Applying YAWL for the Automated Execution of Film Production Processes. YAWL White Paper (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ouyang, C., ter Hofstede, A., La Rosa, M., Rosemann, M., Shortland, K., Court, D.: Camera, Set, Action: Automating Film Production via Business Process Management. In: Proc. of International Conference “Creating Value: Between Commerce and Commons” (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. La Rosa, M., Lux, J., Seidel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-driven Configuration of Reference Process Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 424–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 18(6), 483–497 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hounat, H., Badii, A.: Multi-media Requirements Elicitation Assistant (MMREA). In: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Transfer (KT 1996), London University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Badii, A., Sailor, M., Marangoni, C., Neglia, A., Pearce, L.: Object Life Cycles & Interaction Environments for Cross Media Production & Distribution. In: Proc. of the 1st AXMEDIS International Conference, Florence, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, W., Badii, A.: Integrated object oriented architecture for workflow-embedded document management. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Transfer (KT 1997), University College London, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Badii, A., Khan, A., Adetoye, A., Fuschi, D.: High Resolution Digital Media Personalisation for All Delivery Context Device Agents. In: Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Distributed Multimedia Systems (DMS 2008), Boston, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bimber, O.: Visual Effects and Beyond. Computer 42(7), 33–34 (2009), doi:10.1109/MC.2009.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. D2.1 Spectator response factors, production, workflow and technology requirements for stereoscopic and immersive video. 2020 3D Media Spatial Sound and Video, Tech. Rep. and deliverable 41-63, 92-132 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. D3.3 Workflow, Metadata, and Semantic Definitions Report. 2020 3D Media Spatial Sound and Video, Tech. Rep. and deliverable (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. D2.4.1 Experimentation work flow used in the project early stages. 2020 3D Media Spatial Sound and Video, Tech. Rep. and deliverable (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  52. D3.4 Semantically Driven Work-flow System. 2020 3D Media Spatial Sound and Video, Tech. Rep. and deliverable (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Digital Cinema System Specification - Version 1.2, Digital Cinema Initiatives, LLC (DCI) (March 07, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stereoscopic Digital Cinema Addendum - Version 1.0, Digital Cinema Initiatives, LLC (DCI) (July 11, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Digital Cinema System Specification - Compliance Test Plan - Version 1.0, Digital Cinema Initiatives, LLC (DCI) (October 16, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  56. WfMC Workflow Standard-Interoperability Abstract Specification Version 1.0. Workflow Management Coalition, Tech. Rep. (October 20, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  57. WfMC Workflow Process Definition Interface – XML Process Definition Language Version 1.0. Workflow Management Coalition, Tech. Rep. (October 25, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Badii, A., Fuschi, D.L. (2013). A Unified Test Procedure Designed for Monitoring the Experimental Settings Ensuring Quality Assurance in 3D and Stereoscopic Productions. In: Nesi, P., Santucci, R. (eds) Information Technologies for Performing Arts, Media Access, and Entertainment. ECLAP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40050-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40050-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40049-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40050-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics