Skip to main content

StdTrip+K: Design Rationale in the RDB-to-RDF Process

  • Conference paper
Book cover Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2013)

Abstract

The design rationale behind the triplification of a relational database is a valuable information source, especially for the process of interlinking published triplesets. Indeed, studies show that the arbitrary use of the owl:sameAs property, without carrying context information regarding the triplesets to be linked, has jeopardized the reuse of the triplesets. This article therefore proposes the StdTrip+K process that integrates a design rationale approach with a triplification strategy. The process supports the reuse of standard RDF vocabularies recommended by W3C for publishing datasets and automatically collects the entire rationale behind the ontology design, using a specific vocabulary called Kuaba+W.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auer, S., Dietzold, S., Lehmann, J., Hellmann, S., Aumueller, D.: Triplify: light-weight linked data publication from relational databases. In: WWW 2009, pp. 621–630. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bizer, C., Seaborne, A.: D2RQ-treating non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5(3), 1–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerbah, F.: Learning highly structured semantic repositories from relational databases: The RDBToOnto Tool. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 777–781. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cullot, N., Ghawi, R., Yétongnon, K.: DB2OWL: A Tool for Automatic Database-to-Ontology Mapping. In: SEBD, pp. 491–494 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dividino, R., Schenk, S., Sizov, Staab, S.: Provenance, Trust, Explanations – and all that other Meta Knowledge. Künstliche Intelligenz KI 23(2), 24–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erling, O., Mikhailov, I.: RDF support in the virtuoso DBMS. Networked Knowledge-Networked Media, 7–24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J.: Design Rationale Systems: Understanding the Issues. IEEE Expert 12(13), 78–85 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J., Lai, K.: What’s in Design Rationale. Human-Comput. Interaction 6(3-4), 251–280 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maclean, A., Young, R., Bellotti, V., Moran, T.: Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. Human-Comput. Interaction 6(3-4), 201–250 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McGuinness, D., Harmelen, F.: OWL web ontology language – W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (retrieved February 2013)

  12. Medeiros, A.P., Schwabe, D.: Kuaba approach: Integrating formal semantics and design rationale representation to support design reuse. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22, 399–419 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prud’hommeaux, E., Hausenblas, M.: Use cases and requirements for mapping relational databases to rdf (2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-ucr/ (retrieved November 27, 2012)

  14. Salas, P., Viterbo, J., Breitman, K., Casanova, M.A.: StdTrip: Promoting the Reuse of Standard Vocabularies in Open Government Data. In: Wood, D. (ed.) Linking Government Data, pp. 113–134. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sequeda, J., Depena, R., Miranker: Ultrawrap: Using SQL views for RDB2RDF. In: Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference. ISWC 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berardi, R., Breitman, K., Casanova, M.A., Lopes, G.R., de Medeiros, A.P. (2013). StdTrip+K: Design Rationale in the RDB-to-RDF Process. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Basl, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8055. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40284-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40285-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics