Abstract
Rapid advancement in technology has called for the needs on training students to be creative and innovative as well as possess high quality problem solving skills in meeting the demand and enhancing quality of life in the 21st century. This paper reveals that robotic education has the potential to become an effective teaching tool focuses on enhancing students’ understanding and hands-on experience towards scientific subjects as well as to enhance their physical, emotion, spiritual and social developments. In this paper, we propose a holistic robotic education support program, namely the Transformative Robotic Education (Trans-RoE), which aspires to fulfill the Malaysia National Philosophy of Education in line with the implementation of Secondary School Standard Curriculum (KSSM), and to promote Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education in line with Malaysia’s national vision to produce highly skilled workers to meet the demand of the 21st Century. It is hoped that this program will spearhead the formal training of robotic education in the Malaysia educational system for the long term benefits of the nation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sergeyev, A., Alaraje, N.: Promoting Robotics Education: Curriculum and State-of-the Art Robotics Laboratory Development. Technology Interface Journal 10(3) (2010)
Murali, R.R.: Exam-oriented system: Evaluate Students on All Their Abilities, New Straits Times, http://www.nst.com.my/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/exam-oriented-systemevaluate-students-on-all-their-abilities-1.58757
Singh, M.R.: Transforming Our Educational System: The Brutal Truth, http://hornbillunleashed.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/32455/
Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Carrignon, S.: Representations to Go: Learning Robotics, Learning by Robotics. In: Workshop Proceedings of Intl. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, SIMPAR 2010, pp. 484–493 (2010)
Barker, B.S., Ansorge, J.: Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment. J. Research on Tech. in Edu. 39(3), 229–243 (2007)
Brand, B., Collver, M., Kasarda, M.: Motivating Students with Robotics, http://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid=1H0C363VW1PMM16ZN5C/NSTA_Motivating%20Students%20with%20Robotics.pdf
Vollstedt, A.M., Robinson, M., Wang, E.: Using Robotics to Enhance Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Curricula, http://www.asee.org/documents/sections/pacific-southwest/2007/Vollstedt_et_al.pdf
French, G.: Children’s Early Learning and Development, http://www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/Curriculum/1d%20background%20paper%20may.pdf
Santrock, J.W.: Life Span Development, 11th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2009)
Alimisis, D., Michele, M., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Frangou, S., Papanikolaou, K.: Robotics & Constructivism in Education: The TERECoP Project. In: Kalas, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 11th European Logo Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia, Faculty of Methematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, August 19-24 (2007) ISBN 978-80-89186-20-4
Papert, S.: Situating Constructionism. In: Papert, Harel (eds.) Constructionism. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
Clayson, J.: Constructionism-constructionist Approach to Creative Learning, Thinking and Education: Lessons for the 21st Century, http://alumnionline.aup.edu/page.aspx?pid=666
Ostashewski, N., Moisey, S., Reid, D.: Constructionist Principles in Online Teacher Professional Development: Robotics and Hands-on Activities in the Classroom. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(6), 721–729
Alimisis, D., Kynigos, C.: Constructionism and Robotics in education. In: Alimisis, D. (ed.) Teacher Education on Robotic-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods, pp. 11–26. ASPETE, Athens (2009)
Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between Learning and Development. From: Mind and Society, pp. 79–91. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)
Jea, K.H., In, Y.H., Byoung, S.K.: Educational Robotic Construction Kit: Bioloid. Robotis Co. Ltd, Seoul (2008)
Psycharis, S., Makri-Botsari, E., Xynogalas, G.: The Use of Educational Robotics for the Teaching of Physics and Its Relation to Self-Esteem, http://monicareggiani.net/simpar2008TeachingWithRobotics/psycharis_et_al.pdf
Cincelli, S., Festi, G., Finotti, F., Lenzen, D., Monfalcon, S.: Teaching with Robotics: Different Experiences at School After the TERECoP Courses, http://www.terecop.edu/SIMPAR2010/TR-TWR-2010/05-TeachingRobotics.pdf
Chandra, V.: Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Robotics in Middle-Years of Schooling. In: Envisioning the Future: The Role of Curriculum Materials and Learning Environments in Educational Reform, The 6th SMTE Organizing Committee, Parkview Hotel, Hualien, Taiwan, pp. 33–40 (2008)
Hirsch, L., Carpinelli, J., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., Burr-Alexander, L.: The Impact of Introducing Robotics in Middle- and High-school Science and Mathematics Classrooms, http://soe.rutgers.edu/files/The%20Impact%20of%20Introducing%20Robotics%20in%20Middle%20and%20High%20School.pdf
Alimisis, D.: 3 Years of Joint Work in Educational Robotics: The TERECoP Project. Lessons Learnt from the TERECoP Project and New Pathways into Educational Robotics Across Europe, Conference, September 22. ASPETE, Athens (2009)
Goh, H., Aris, B.: Using Robotics in Education: Lessons Learned and Learning Experiences, http://eprints.utm.my/6015/1/149-henry.pdf
Williamson, K.: Enhancing Students’ Math and Science Education through Information Technology Skills in Robotics, http://www.ijme.is/cd_08/PDF/2-eng%20107.pdf
Ramli, R., Yunus, M.M., Ishak, N.M.: Experience of Robotic Teaching for Malaysian Gifted Enrichment Program at PERMATApintar, http://www.wseas.us/elibrary/conferences/2010/Japan/EDU/EDU-25.pdf
Rahman, Z.B.A., Ahmad, M.B.: Malaysia Curriculum Planning, Development and Reform, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/curriculum/Asia%20Networkpdf/ndrepmy.pdf
Morrison, J.: Attributes of STEM Education: The Student, the School, the Classroom. The Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM: Baltimore, MD (2006)
Lantz, H.B.: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. What Form? What Function?, http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf
Pittil, K., Curto, K., Garcia, J., Moreno, V., Ontiyuelo, R.: Use of an Infocenter to Improve the Management and Understanding of Project-Based Learning Robotics, http://www.innoc.at/fileadmin/user_upload/_temp_/RiE/Proceedings/35.pdf
Alimisis, D., Karatrantou, A., Tachos, N.: Technical School Students Design and Develop Robotic Gear-Based Constructions for the Transmission of Motion. In: Gregorczyk, G., Walat, A., Kranas, W., Borowiecki, M. (eds.) Eurologo 2005, Digital Tools for Lifelong Learning, Proceedings, pp. 76–86. DrukSfera, Warsaw (2005)
Malaysia Examination Council, http://www.mpm.edu.my/documents/10156/2908afbd-f6bc-489c-bec5-3d52530b4d51
Butler, A.J., James, T.W., James, K.H.: Enhanced Multisensory Integration and Motor Reactivation After Active Motos Learning of Audiovisual Associations. J. Cog. Neuroscience 23(11), 3515–3528 (2011)
Barraket, J.: Teaching Research Method Using a Student-Centered Approach? Critical Reflections on Practice. J. University Teaching and Learning Practice 2(2), 64–74 (2005)
Pedersen, S., Liu, M.: Teachers’ Beliefs about Issues in the Implementation of a Student-Centered Learning Environment. Education Technology Research Development 51(2), 57–76 (2003)
Al-Agili, M.Z.G., Mamat, M., Abdullah, L., Abdul Maad, H.: The Factors Influence Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Case for Libyan’s Students. World Applied Sciences Journal 17(9), 1224–1230 (2012)
Monoranjan, B., Bharati, B.: Fuzzy Measure of Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematic. Int’ J. Research Studies in Education (2012), doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2012.122
Mohamed, L., Waheed, H.: Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics in a Selected School of Maldives. Int’ J. Humanities and Soc. Sci. 1(15), 277–281 (2011)
Babaei, A., Chaiichi-Mellatshahi, M., Najafi, M.: Intuition and Its Effects on Mathematical Learning. Indian J. Science and Technology 5(7) (July 1, 2012)
Raami, A., Mielenen, S., Keinanem, M.: Designers’ Experiences of Intuition. Coaching Intuitive Skills as Part of Creative Design Process, http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lib/ir/onlineconferences/cumulus/Raami.pdf
Harker, M., Harker, D.: Achieving Deep Learning with Student Teamwork: An Exploratory Investigation. E-Journal of Business Edu. & Scholarship of Teaching 1(1), 24–40 (2007)
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Kirschner, P.: Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments. Team learning Beliefs and Behavior. Small Group Research 37(5), 490–521 (2006)
Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., Chambers, J.: Using LEGO Robotics in a Project-Based Learning Environment. The Interactive Multimedia Electronic J. Computer-Enhanced Learning 6(1), http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2004/1/02/index.asp
Savery, J.R.: Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary J. Problem-Based Learning 1(1), 9–20 (2006)
Spady, W.: Outcomes Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administration, Arlington, Virginia (1994)
Meyer, M.: Outcome-based Education: Back to the Basics or a New Paradigm for Training Staff? SAND Bulletin for Educational Technology 24(1), 1–12 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Loh, S.C., Loo, C.K., Loh, H.C., Lim, Y.K. (2013). Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysia National Philosophy of Education. In: Omar, K., et al. Intelligent Robotics Systems: Inspiring the NEXT. FIRA 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40408-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40409-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)