Skip to main content

Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysia National Philosophy of Education

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Robotics Systems: Inspiring the NEXT (FIRA 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 376))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Rapid advancement in technology has called for the needs on training students to be creative and innovative as well as possess high quality problem solving skills in meeting the demand and enhancing quality of life in the 21st century. This paper reveals that robotic education has the potential to become an effective teaching tool focuses on enhancing students’ understanding and hands-on experience towards scientific subjects as well as to enhance their physical, emotion, spiritual and social developments. In this paper, we propose a holistic robotic education support program, namely the Transformative Robotic Education (Trans-RoE), which aspires to fulfill the Malaysia National Philosophy of Education in line with the implementation of Secondary School Standard Curriculum (KSSM), and to promote Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education in line with Malaysia’s national vision to produce highly skilled workers to meet the demand of the 21st Century. It is hoped that this program will spearhead the formal training of robotic education in the Malaysia educational system for the long term benefits of the nation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sergeyev, A., Alaraje, N.: Promoting Robotics Education: Curriculum and State-of-the Art Robotics Laboratory Development. Technology Interface Journal 10(3) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murali, R.R.: Exam-oriented system: Evaluate Students on All Their Abilities, New Straits Times, http://www.nst.com.my/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/exam-oriented-systemevaluate-students-on-all-their-abilities-1.58757

  3. Singh, M.R.: Transforming Our Educational System: The Brutal Truth, http://hornbillunleashed.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/32455/

  4. Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Carrignon, S.: Representations to Go: Learning Robotics, Learning by Robotics. In: Workshop Proceedings of Intl. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots, SIMPAR 2010, pp. 484–493 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barker, B.S., Ansorge, J.: Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment. J. Research on Tech. in Edu. 39(3), 229–243 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brand, B., Collver, M., Kasarda, M.: Motivating Students with Robotics, http://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid=1H0C363VW1PMM16ZN5C/NSTA_Motivating%20Students%20with%20Robotics.pdf

  7. Vollstedt, A.M., Robinson, M., Wang, E.: Using Robotics to Enhance Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Curricula, http://www.asee.org/documents/sections/pacific-southwest/2007/Vollstedt_et_al.pdf

  8. French, G.: Children’s Early Learning and Development, http://www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/Curriculum/1d%20background%20paper%20may.pdf

  9. Santrock, J.W.: Life Span Development, 11th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alimisis, D., Michele, M., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Frangou, S., Papanikolaou, K.: Robotics & Constructivism in Education: The TERECoP Project. In: Kalas, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 11th European Logo Conference, Bratislava, Slovakia, Faculty of Methematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, August 19-24 (2007) ISBN 978-80-89186-20-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papert, S.: Situating Constructionism. In: Papert, Harel (eds.) Constructionism. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clayson, J.: Constructionism-constructionist Approach to Creative Learning, Thinking and Education: Lessons for the 21st Century, http://alumnionline.aup.edu/page.aspx?pid=666

  13. Ostashewski, N., Moisey, S., Reid, D.: Constructionist Principles in Online Teacher Professional Development: Robotics and Hands-on Activities in the Classroom. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(6), 721–729

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alimisis, D., Kynigos, C.: Constructionism and Robotics in education. In: Alimisis, D. (ed.) Teacher Education on Robotic-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods, pp. 11–26. ASPETE, Athens (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vygotsky, L.: Interaction between Learning and Development. From: Mind and Society, pp. 79–91. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jea, K.H., In, Y.H., Byoung, S.K.: Educational Robotic Construction Kit: Bioloid. Robotis Co. Ltd, Seoul (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Psycharis, S., Makri-Botsari, E., Xynogalas, G.: The Use of Educational Robotics for the Teaching of Physics and Its Relation to Self-Esteem, http://monicareggiani.net/simpar2008TeachingWithRobotics/psycharis_et_al.pdf

  18. Cincelli, S., Festi, G., Finotti, F., Lenzen, D., Monfalcon, S.: Teaching with Robotics: Different Experiences at School After the TERECoP Courses, http://www.terecop.edu/SIMPAR2010/TR-TWR-2010/05-TeachingRobotics.pdf

  19. Chandra, V.: Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Robotics in Middle-Years of Schooling. In: Envisioning the Future: The Role of Curriculum Materials and Learning Environments in Educational Reform, The 6th SMTE Organizing Committee, Parkview Hotel, Hualien, Taiwan, pp. 33–40 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirsch, L., Carpinelli, J., Kimmel, H., Rockland, R., Burr-Alexander, L.: The Impact of Introducing Robotics in Middle- and High-school Science and Mathematics Classrooms, http://soe.rutgers.edu/files/The%20Impact%20of%20Introducing%20Robotics%20in%20Middle%20and%20High%20School.pdf

  21. Alimisis, D.: 3 Years of Joint Work in Educational Robotics: The TERECoP Project. Lessons Learnt from the TERECoP Project and New Pathways into Educational Robotics Across Europe, Conference, September 22. ASPETE, Athens (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goh, H., Aris, B.: Using Robotics in Education: Lessons Learned and Learning Experiences, http://eprints.utm.my/6015/1/149-henry.pdf

  23. Williamson, K.: Enhancing Students’ Math and Science Education through Information Technology Skills in Robotics, http://www.ijme.is/cd_08/PDF/2-eng%20107.pdf

  24. Ramli, R., Yunus, M.M., Ishak, N.M.: Experience of Robotic Teaching for Malaysian Gifted Enrichment Program at PERMATApintar, http://www.wseas.us/elibrary/conferences/2010/Japan/EDU/EDU-25.pdf

  25. Rahman, Z.B.A., Ahmad, M.B.: Malaysia Curriculum Planning, Development and Reform, http://www.ibe.unesco.org/curriculum/Asia%20Networkpdf/ndrepmy.pdf

  26. Morrison, J.: Attributes of STEM Education: The Student, the School, the Classroom. The Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM: Baltimore, MD (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lantz, H.B.: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. What Form? What Function?, http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf

  28. Pittil, K., Curto, K., Garcia, J., Moreno, V., Ontiyuelo, R.: Use of an Infocenter to Improve the Management and Understanding of Project-Based Learning Robotics, http://www.innoc.at/fileadmin/user_upload/_temp_/RiE/Proceedings/35.pdf

  29. Alimisis, D., Karatrantou, A., Tachos, N.: Technical School Students Design and Develop Robotic Gear-Based Constructions for the Transmission of Motion. In: Gregorczyk, G., Walat, A., Kranas, W., Borowiecki, M. (eds.) Eurologo 2005, Digital Tools for Lifelong Learning, Proceedings, pp. 76–86. DrukSfera, Warsaw (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Malaysia Examination Council, http://www.mpm.edu.my/documents/10156/2908afbd-f6bc-489c-bec5-3d52530b4d51

  31. Butler, A.J., James, T.W., James, K.H.: Enhanced Multisensory Integration and Motor Reactivation After Active Motos Learning of Audiovisual Associations. J. Cog. Neuroscience 23(11), 3515–3528 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Barraket, J.: Teaching Research Method Using a Student-Centered Approach? Critical Reflections on Practice. J. University Teaching and Learning Practice 2(2), 64–74 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pedersen, S., Liu, M.: Teachers’ Beliefs about Issues in the Implementation of a Student-Centered Learning Environment. Education Technology Research Development 51(2), 57–76 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Agili, M.Z.G., Mamat, M., Abdullah, L., Abdul Maad, H.: The Factors Influence Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Case for Libyan’s Students. World Applied Sciences Journal 17(9), 1224–1230 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Monoranjan, B., Bharati, B.: Fuzzy Measure of Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematic. Int’ J. Research Studies in Education (2012), doi: 10.5861/ijrse.2012.122

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mohamed, L., Waheed, H.: Secondary Students’ Attitude towards Mathematics in a Selected School of Maldives. Int’ J. Humanities and Soc. Sci. 1(15), 277–281 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Babaei, A., Chaiichi-Mellatshahi, M., Najafi, M.: Intuition and Its Effects on Mathematical Learning. Indian J. Science and Technology 5(7) (July 1, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raami, A., Mielenen, S., Keinanem, M.: Designers’ Experiences of Intuition. Coaching Intuitive Skills as Part of Creative Design Process, http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lib/ir/onlineconferences/cumulus/Raami.pdf

  39. Harker, M., Harker, D.: Achieving Deep Learning with Student Teamwork: An Exploratory Investigation. E-Journal of Business Edu. & Scholarship of Teaching 1(1), 24–40 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Kirschner, P.: Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments. Team learning Beliefs and Behavior. Small Group Research 37(5), 490–521 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carbonaro, M., Rex, M., Chambers, J.: Using LEGO Robotics in a Project-Based Learning Environment. The Interactive Multimedia Electronic J. Computer-Enhanced Learning 6(1), http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2004/1/02/index.asp

  42. Savery, J.R.: Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Interdisciplinary J. Problem-Based Learning 1(1), 9–20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spady, W.: Outcomes Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administration, Arlington, Virginia (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Meyer, M.: Outcome-based Education: Back to the Basics or a New Paradigm for Training Staff? SAND Bulletin for Educational Technology 24(1), 1–12 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loh, S.C., Loo, C.K., Loh, H.C., Lim, Y.K. (2013). Transformative Robotic Education for the Realization of Malaysia National Philosophy of Education. In: Omar, K., et al. Intelligent Robotics Systems: Inspiring the NEXT. FIRA 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40409-2_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40408-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40409-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics