Skip to main content

Committee-Based Active Learning for Dependency Parsing

  • Conference paper
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8092))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Annotations on structured corpora provide a foundational instrument for emerging linguistic research. To generate annotations automatically, data-driven dependency parsers need a large annotated corpus to learn from. But these annotations are expensive to collect and require a labor intensive task. In order to reduce the costs of annotation, we provide a novel framework in which a committee of dependency parsers collaborate to improve their efficiency using active learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lewis, D.D., Gale, W.A.: A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In: The 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 3–12 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sebastian Seung, M.O., Sompolinsky, H.: Query by committee. In: The 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 287–294 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mirroshandel, S.A., Nasr, A.: Active learning for dependency parsing using partially annotated sentences. In: The 12th International Conference on Parsing Technologies, pp. 140–149 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McDonald, R., Pereira, F., Ribarov, K., Hajič, J.: Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In: Proc. of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 523–530 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohnet, B.: Top accuracy and fast dependency parsing is not a contradiction. In: Proc. of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 89–97 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Attardi, G.: Experiments with a multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. In: Proc. of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 166–170 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bosco, C., Lombardo, V., Vassallo, D., Lesmo, L.: Building a treebank for italian: a data-driven annotation schema. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 99–105 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Majidi, S., Crane, G. (2013). Committee-Based Active Learning for Dependency Parsing. In: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., Farrugia, C.J. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8092. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40501-3_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40500-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40501-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics