Skip to main content

Requirements Definition for Domain-Specific Modelling Languages: The ComVantage Case

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 158))

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to investigate the challenge of defining and answering modelling language requirements with domain specificity in the instance case of the ComVantage EU research project, which provides a multifaceted domain, with subdomains identified along two dimensions: a) the application dimension, where subdomains are defined by the application areas providing use cases: mobile maintenance, customer-oriented production and production line commissioning; b) the technical dimension, where subdomains are derived from a grouping of the encountered technical problems - supply chain definition in virtual enterprises, business process-driven mobile app and data requirements, business process management considering the execution environment and control of access to its resources/artefacts, design of products and services, or incident escalation management. The paper describes the requirements sources, their definition methodology and an initial derivation of modelling method building blocks from the identified requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The ComVantage Project Public Deliverables, http://www.comvantage.eu/results-publications/public-deriverables/

  2. Checkland, P.B., Poulter, J.: Learning for Action: A short definitive account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, teachers and Students. Wiley (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karagiannis, D., Kühn, H.: Metamodelling platforms. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds.) EC-Web 2002. LNCS, vol. 2455, p. 182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. OMILab, the ComVantage experimentation space, http://www.openmodels.at/web/comvantage/home

  5. Karagiannis, D., Visic, N.: Next Generation of Modelling Platforms. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) BIR 2011. LNBIP, vol. 90, pp. 19–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hrgovic, V., Utz, W., Karagiannis, D.: Service Modelling: A Model Based Approach for Business and IT Alignment. In: The 5th Int. IEEE Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Services (COMPSAC Workshops), pp. 422–427. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lundqvist, M., Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U.: Enterprise Modelling in Distributed Teams-Lessons Learned from Information Demand Modelling. In: Kirikova, N., Stirna, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the CAISE Forum 2012. CEUR Proceedings, vol. 855, pp. 139-146, CEUR-WS.org (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lundqvist, M., Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U.: Transfer of Method Knowledge and Modelling in Distributed Teams – Lessons Learned. In: Aseeva, N., Babkin, E., Kozyrev, O. (eds.) BIR 2012. LNBIP, vol. 128, pp. 26–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Businska, L., Kirikova, M.: Knowledge Dimension in Business Process Modeling. In: Nurcan, S. (ed.) CAiSE Forum 2011. LNBIP, vol. 107, pp. 186–201. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Burge, J.E.: Knowledge Elicitation Tool Classification, http://web.cs.wpi.edu/~jburge/thesis/kematrix.html#_Toc417957413

  11. The Linked Data Design Issues, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

  12. SPARQL Query Language, the official web page, http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/

  13. ADOxx – the official product page, http://www.adoxx.org/live/

  14. Website of Volere Requirements Specification Template, http://www.volere.co.uk/

  15. Pruitt, K., Adlin, T.: The Persona Lifecycle. Morgan Kaufmann (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fill, H.-G., Redmond, T., Karagiannis, D.: FDMM: A Formalism for Describing ADOxx Meta Models and Models. In: Maciaszek, L.A., Cuzzocrea, A., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Proceedings of ICEIS, pp. 133–144. SciTePress (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Márquez, A.C.: The Maintenance Management Framework. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Supply Chain Operations Reference, http://supply-chain.org/scor

  19. Liepina, L., Kirikova, M.: SCOR based ISS Requirements Identification. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Węcel, K. (eds.) BIS 2011 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 97, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: E3-value: design and evaluation of e-Business models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(4), 11–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/90tr021.pdf

  22. ADONIS – Community Edition, the official website, http://www.adonis-community.com/

  23. Calvary, G., Coutaz, J., Thevenin, D., Limbourg, Q., Bouillon, L., Vanderdonckt, J.: A Unifying Reference Framework for Multi-Target User Interfaces. Interacting with Computers 15(3), 289–308 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Software supporting the SCOR framework, http://supply-chain.org/scor/software

  25. XACML specification, the official website, https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml#CURRENT

  26. Kano, N., Nobuhiku, S., Fumio, T., Shinichi, T.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  27. BPMN, the official website, http://www.bpmn.org/

  28. Mylopoulos, J.: Conceptual modeling and Telos1. In: Loucopoulos, P., Zicari, R. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and Case An Integrated View of Information Systems Development, pp. 49–68. Wiley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buchmann, R.A., Karagiannis, D., Visic, N. (2013). Requirements Definition for Domain-Specific Modelling Languages: The ComVantage Case. In: Kobyliński, A., Sobczak, A. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 158. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40823-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics