Skip to main content

How to Update Neighborhood Models

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8196))

Abstract

This paper studies two ways of updating neighborhood models: update by taking the intersection of the neighborhoods with the announced proposition, and update by selecting all the neighborhoods that can entail the announced proposition. For each of these two ways, we establish reduction axioms and some basic model-theoretic results on public announcement logic and dynamic epistemic logic of product update. We also study various notions of group knowledge such as common and distributed knowledge over neighborhood models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balbiani, P., van Ditmarsch, H., Kudinov, A.: Subset space logic with arbitrary announcements. In: Lodaya, K. (ed.) ICLA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7750, pp. 233–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Proceedings of TARK, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Los Altos (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gasquet, O.: Completeness results in neighborhood semantics for multi-modal monotonic and regualr logics. The Journal of IGPL 4(3), 417–426 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, H.H.: Monotonic modal logic. Master’s thesis. ILLC, University of Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heifetz, A.: Iterative and fixed point common belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 61–79 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Holliday, W., Icard III, T.: Moorean phenomena in epistemic logic. In: Advances in Modal Logic 2010, pp. 178–199. College Publications (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lismont, L., Mongin, P.: On the logic of common belief and common knowledge. Theory and Decision 37, 75–106 (1994a)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lismont, L., Mongin, P.: Strong completeness theorems for weak logics of common belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32, 115–137 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Osherson, de Jongh, D., Martin, D.E., Weinstein, S.: Formal learning theory. In: Van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 737–776. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Plaza, J.: Logics of public communication. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 201–206 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Benthem, J., Pacuit, E.: Dynamic logic of evidence-based belief. Studia Logica 99, 61–92 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Benthem, J., Sarenac, D.: The geometry of knowledge. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Leite, A., Facchini, A. (eds.) Aspects of Universal Logic, pp. 1–30. Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques, Université de Neuchatel (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Benthem, J., Van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204, 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Ditmarsch, H., Van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, M., Sano, K. (2013). How to Update Neighborhood Models. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics