Skip to main content

A Novel and Model Independent Approach for Efficient Influence Maximization in Social Networks

  • Conference paper
Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2013 (WISE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8181))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most of the recent online social media collects a huge volume of data not just about who is linked with whom (aka link data) but also, about who is interacting with whom (aka interaction data). The presence of both variety and volume in these datasets pose new challenges while conducting social network analysis. In particular, we present a general framework to deal with both variety and volume in the data for a key social network analysis task - Influence Maximization. The well known influence maximization problem [15] (or viral marketing through social networks) deals with selecting a few influential initial seeds to maximize the awareness of product(s) over the social network. As it is computationally hard [15], a greedy approximation algorithm is designed to address the influence maximization problem. However, the major drawback of this greedy algorithm is that it runs extremely slow even on network datasets consisting of a few thousand nodes and edges [20,6]. Several efficient heuristics have been proposed in the literature [6] to alleviate this computational difficulty; however these heuristics are designed for specific influence propagation models such as linear threshold model and independent cascade model. This motivates the strong need to design an approach that not only works with any influence propagation model, but also efficiently solves the influence maximization problem. In this paper, we precisely address this problem by proposing a new framework which fuses both link and interaction data to come up with a backbone for a given social network, which can further be used for efficient influence maximization. We then conduct thorough experimentation with several real life social network datasets such as DBLP, Epinions, Digg, and Slashdot and show that the proposed approach is efficient as well as scalable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bharathi, S., Kempe, D., Salek, M.: Competitive influence maximization in social networks. In: Deng, X., Graham, F.C. (eds.) WINE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4858, pp. 306–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Borodin, A., Filmus, Y., Oren, J.: Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks. In: Saberi, A. (ed.) WINE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6484, pp. 539–550. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., Hullender, G.: Learning to rank using gradient descent. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ICML, pp. 89–96 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budak, C., Agrawal, D., Abbadi, A.E.: Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In: Proceedings of WWW, pp. 665–674 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carnes, T., Nagarajan, C., Wild, S., van Zuylen, A.: Maximizing in uence in a competitive social network: a follower’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC), pp. 351–360 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, W., Wang, Y., Yang, S.: Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD, pp. 937–944 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Datta, S., Majumder, A., Shrivastava, N.: Viral marketing for multiple products. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICDM, pp. 118–127 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Mining the network value of customers. In: Proceedings of the 7th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 57–66 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dwork, C., Kumar, R., Naor, M., Sivakumar, D.: Rank aggregation methods for the web. In: Proceedings of WWW, pp. 613–622 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal, A., Bonchi, F.: Laks V. S. Lakshmanan. Learning influence probabilities in social networks. In: WSDM, pp. 241–250 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal, A., Lu, W., Lakshmanan, L.V.S.: SIMPATH: An Efficient Algorithm for Influence Maximization under the Linear Threshold Model. In: ICDM, pp. 211–220 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., Lakshmanan, L.V.S.: A Data-Based Approach to Social Influence Maximization. In: PVLDB, pp. 73–84 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Muller, E.: Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12(3), 211–223 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He, X., Song, G., Chen, W., Jiang, Q.: Influence blocking maximization in social networks under the competitive linear threshold model. In: Proceedings of the 12th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, SDM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the 9th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 137–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kunegis, J., Lommatzsch, A., Bauckhage, C.: The slashdot zoo: Mining a social network with negative edges. In: Proc. of 18th WWW, pp. 740–750 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lerman, K., Ghosh, R.: Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lermann, K., Intagorn, S., Kang, J.H., Ghosh, R.: Using Proximity to Predict Activity in Social Networks. In: Proceedings of the 21st International World Wide Web Conference (poster) (December 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Signed networks in social media. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1361–1370 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leskovec, J., Krause, A., Guestrin, C., Faloutsos, C., VanBriesen, J., Glance, N.: Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 420–429 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mathioudakis, M., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C., Gionis, A., Ukkonen, A.: Sparsification of influence networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newman, M.E.J.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 98, 404–409 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Newman, M.E.J.: Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74(3), 036104 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramasuri, N., Narahari, Y.: A Shapley Value-Based Approach to Discover Influential Nodes in Social Networks. IEEE T. Automation Science and Engineering 8(1), 130–147 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., Domingos, P.: Trust management for the semantic web. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 351–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 61–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Satuluri, S., Parthasarathy, V., Ruan, Y.: Local graph sparsification for scalable clustering. In: Proc. of SIGMOD, pp. 721–732 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schelling, T.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W.W. Norton and Company (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, J., Leskovec: Defining and evaluating network communities based on ground-truth. In: Proceedings of ICDM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lamba, H., Narayanam, R. (2013). A Novel and Model Independent Approach for Efficient Influence Maximization in Social Networks. In: Lin, X., Manolopoulos, Y., Srivastava, D., Huang, G. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2013. WISE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8181. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41154-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41154-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41153-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41154-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics