Abstract
The time-span tree is a dependable representation of musical structure since most experienced listeners deliver the same one, almost independently of context and subjectivity. In this paper, we pay attention to the reduction hypothesis of the tree structure, and introduce a notion of distance as a promising candidate of stable and consistent metric of similarity. First, we design a feature structure to represent a time-span tree. Next, we regard that when a branch is removed from the tree, that is, its corresponding pitch event is reduced, the amount of information comparable to its time-span is lost. Then, we suggest that the sum of the length of those removed spans is the distance between two trees. We will show mathematical properties of the distance, including that the distance becomes unique in multiple shortest paths. Thereafter, we illustrate how the distance works in a set of reductions. We consider a metric of similarity both from human cognition and from set operation, and discuss the relation of distance and similarity. Also, we discuss such other related issues as flexible tree matching and music rendering.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bod, R.: A Unified Model of Structural Organization in Language and Music. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17, 289–308 (2002)
Carpenter, B.: The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge University Press (1992)
Dibben, N.: Cognitive Reality of Hierarchic Structure in Tonal and Atonal Music. Music Perception 12(1), 1–25 (1994)
Downie, J.S., Byrd, D., Crawford, T.: Ten Years of ISMIR: Reflections of Challenges and Opportunities. In: Proceedings of ISMIR 2009, pp. 13–18 (2009)
ESCOM: 2007 Discussion Forum 4A. Similarity Perception in Listening to Music. MusicæScientiæ (2007)
ESCOM: 2009 Discussion Forum 4B. Musical Similarity. Musicæ Scientiæ (2009)
Grachten, M., Arcos, J.-L., de Mantaras, R.L.: Melody retrieval using the Implication/Realization model, MIREX (2005), http://www.music-ir.org/evaluation/mirexresults/articles/similarity/grachten.pdf
Hamanaka, M., Hirata, K., Tojo, S.: Implementing “A Generative Theory of Tonal Music”. Journal of New Music Research 35(4), 249–277 (2007)
Hewlett, W.B., Selfridge-Field, E.: Melodic Similarity. Computing in Musicology, vol. 11. The MIT Press (1998)
Hirata, K., Tojo, S.: Lattice for Musical Structure and Its Arithmetics. In: Washio, T., Satoh, K., Takeda, H., Inokuchi, A. (eds.) JSAI 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4384, pp. 54–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Hirata, K., Tojo, S., Hamanaka, M.: Melodic Morphing Algorithm in Formalism. In: Agon, C., Andreatta, M., Assayag, G., Amiot, E., Bresson, J., Mandereau, J. (eds.) MCM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6726, pp. 338–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Lartillot, O.: Multi-Dimensional Motivic Pattern Extraction Founded on Adaptive Redundancy Filtering. Journal of New Music Research 34(4), 375–393 (2005)
Lerdahl, F., Jackendoff, R.: A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. The MIT Press (1983)
Marsden, A.: Generative Structural Representation of Tonal Music. Journal of New Music Research 34(4), 409–428 (2005)
Ockelford, A.: Similarity relations between groups of notes: Music-theoretical and music-psychological perspectives. MusicæScientiæ, Discussion Forum 4B, Musical Similarity, 47–98 (2009)
Pampalk, E.: Computational Models of Music Similarity and their Application in Music Information Retrieval. PhD Thesis, Vienna University of Technology (March 2006)
Parsons, D.: The Directory of Classical Themes. Piatkus Books (2008)
Rizo Valero, D.: Symbolic Music Comparison with Tree Data Structure. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat d’ Alacant, Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informatícos (2010)
Sag, I.A., Wasow, T.: Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. CSLI Publications (1999)
Schedl, M., Knees, P., Böck, S.: Investigating the Similarity Space of Music Artists on the Micro-Blogosphere. In: Proceedings of ISMIR 2011, pp. 323–328 (2011)
Selfridge-Field, E.: Conceptual and Representational Issues in Melodic Comparison. Computing in Musicology 11, 3–64 (1998)
Tan, P.N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V.: Introduction to Data Mining. Addison-Wesley (2005)
Volk, A., Wiering, F.: Music Similarity. In: Proceedings of ISMIR 2011 Tutorial on Musicology (2011), http://ismir2011.ismir.net/tutorials/ISMIR2011-Tutorial-Musicology.pdf
Wiggins, G.A.: Semantic Gap?? Schematic Schmap!! Methodological Considerations in the Scientific Study of Music. In: 2009 11th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pp. 477–482 (2009)
Wiggins, G.A., Müllensiefen, D., Pearce, M.T.: On the non-existence of music: Why music theory is a figment of the imagination. MusicæScientiæ, Discussion Forum 5, 231–255 (2010)
Wilson, R.A., Keil, F. (eds.): The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. The MIT Press (May 1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tojo, S., Hirata, K. (2013). Structural Similarity Based on Time-Span Tree. In: Aramaki, M., Barthet, M., Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S. (eds) From Sounds to Music and Emotions. CMMR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7900. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41248-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41248-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41247-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41248-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)