Skip to main content

Two-Phase Classification Based on Three-Way Decisions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8171))

Abstract

A two-phase classification method is proposed based on three-way decisions. In the first phase, all objects are classified into three different regions by three-way decisions. A positive rule makes a decision of acceptance, a negative rule makes a decision of rejection, and a boundary rule makes a decision of abstaining. The positive region contains those objects that have been assigned a class label with a high level of confidence. The boundary and negative regions contain those objects that have not been assigned class labels. In the second phase, a simple ensemble learning approach to determine the class labels of objects in the boundary or negative regions. Experiments are performed to compare the proposed two-phase classification approach and a classical classification approach. The results show that our method can produce a better classification accuracy than the classical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia, X.Y., Liao, W.H., Tang, Z.M., Shang, L.: Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Information Sciences 219, 151–167 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Jia, X.Y., Zheng, K., Li, W.W., Liu, T.T., Shang, L.: Three-way decisions solution to filter spam email: An empirical study. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7413, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, W., Miao, D.Q., Wang, W.L., Zhang, N.: Hierarchical rough decision theoretic framework for text classification. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics, pp. 484–489 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, H.X., Zhou, X.Z., Zhao, J.B., Huang, B.: Cost-sensitive classification based on decision-theoretic rough set model. In: Li, T., Nguyen, H., Wang, G., Grzymała-Busse, J., Janicki, R., Hassanien, A., Yu, H. (eds.) RSKT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7414, pp. 379–388. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, D., Yao, Y.Y., Li, T.R.: Three-way investment decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 4, 66–74 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets, Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ślęzak, D., Ziarko, W.: The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 40, 81–91 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5(2), 241–260 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lingras, P.: A decision-theoretic rough set model. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems 5, 17–24 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Information Sciences 180, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao, Y.Y.: The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models. Information Sciences 181, 1080–1096 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao, Y.Y.: An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7413, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Z.H.: Ensemble learning. In: Li, S.Z. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Biometrics, pp. 270–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, B., Yao, Y.Y., Luo, J.G.: Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (in press, 2013), doi:10.1007/s10844-013-0254-7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ziarko, W.: Variable precision rough set model. Journal of Computer and System Science 46, 39–59 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. UCI Machine Learning Repository, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, W., Huang, Z., Jia, X. (2013). Two-Phase Classification Based on Three-Way Decisions. In: Lingras, P., Wolski, M., Cornelis, C., Mitra, S., Wasilewski, P. (eds) Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. RSKT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41299-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41299-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41298-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41299-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics