Skip to main content

PrefLib: A Library for Preferences http://www.preflib.org

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8176))

Abstract

We introduce PrefLib: A Library for Preferences; an online resource located at http://www.preflib.org . With the emergence of computational social choice and an increased awareness of the applicability of preference reasoning techniques to areas ranging from recommendation systems to kidney exchanges, the interest in preferences has never been higher. We hope to encourage the growth of all facets of preference reasoning by establishing a centralized repository of high quality data based around simple, delimited data formats. We detail the challenges of constructing such a repository, provide a survey of the initial release of the library, and invite the community to use and help expand PrefLib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bache, K., Lichman, M.: UCI machine learning repository, University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences (2013), http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  2. Bennett, J., Lanning, S.: The Netflix prize. In: Proceedings of the KDD Cup and Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H.H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 21, 135–191 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies, J., Katsirelos, G., Narodytska, N., Walsh, T.: Complexity of and algorithms for Borda manipulation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2011), pp. 657–662. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dickerson, J.P., Procaccia, A.D., Sandholm, T.: Optimizing kidney exchange with transplant chains: Theory and reality. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2012), pp. 711–718 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friedgut, E., Kalai, G., Nisan, N.: Elections can be manipulated often. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2008), pp. 243–249. IEEE Computer Society Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gent, I.P., Walsh, T.: CSPlib: A benchmark library for constraints. In: Jaffar, J. (ed.) CP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1713, pp. 480–481. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gusfield, D., Irving, R.W.: The Stable Marriage Problem: Structure and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 287–293. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mattei, N.: Empirical evaluation of voting rules with strictly ordered preference data. In: Brafman, R. (ed.) ADT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6992, pp. 165–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mattei, N.: Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Theoretical and Empirical Results on Social Choice, Manipulation, and Bribery. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kentucky (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mattei, N., Forshee, J., Goldsmith, J.: An empirical study of voting rules and manipulation with large datasets. In: Fourth International Workshop on Computational Social Choice (COMSOC 2012). Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moulin, H.: Fair Division and Collective Welfare. The MIT Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Popova, A., Regenwetter, M., Mattei, N.: A behavioral perspective on social choice. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (to appear, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Procaccia, A.D., Rosenschein, J.S.: Average-case tractability of manipulation in voting via the fraction of manipulators. In: Proceedings of 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), pp. 718–720. IFAAMAS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Regenwetter, M., Grogman, B., Marley, A.A.J., Testlin, I.M.: Behavioral Social Choice: Probabilistic Models, Statistical Inference, and Applications. Cambridge Univ. Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regenwetter, M., Kim, A., Kantor, A., Ho, M.H.R.: The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods. Psychological Science 18(7), 629–635 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In: Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 1–35. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skowron, P., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.: Achieving fully proportional representation is easy in practice. In: Proceedings of 12th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2013), pp. 399–406 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tideman, T.N., Plassmann, F.: Modeling the outcomes of vote-casting in actual elections. In: Electoral Systems, pp. 217–251. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh, T.: Where are the really hard manipulation problems? The phase transition in manipulating the veto rule. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 324–329 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh, T.: An empirical study of the manipulability of single transferable voting. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2010). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 215, pp. 257–262. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Walsh, T.: Where are the hard manipulation problems? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 42, 1–39 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Xia, L., Conitzer, V.: Generalized scoring rules and the frequency of coalitional manipulability. In: EC 2008: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 109–118. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mattei, N., Walsh, T. (2013). PrefLib: A Library for Preferences http://www.preflib.org . In: Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8176. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41575-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41574-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41575-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics