Abstract
Constraint-based approaches to pragmatics have customarily focused on the hearer, and offered accounts of the optimal interpretation of utterances. Blutner (2006, i.a.) has argued that it is necessary also to consider the role of the speaker, and thus motivates a bidirectional Optimality Theory (OT) approach to pragmatics. However, as he notes, this may have limited explanatory potential from a processing viewpoint. A recent account, focusing on expressions of quantity, aims instead to model the speaker’s choice of expression by means of unidirectional OT mechanisms. In this paper I discuss the merits of this approach versus OT-based alternatives. In particular, I explore the implications of this account for the hearer, who is required to solve the problem of utterance interpretation in a non-OT fashion in this model, and explore how this task can be made tractable. I briefly discuss the novel predictions about interpretation and processing that arise from such a development, and consider the theoretical implications for pragmatics in general.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blutner, R.: Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17, 189–216 (2000)
Blutner, R.: Embedded Implicatures and Optimality Theoretic Pragmatics. In: Solstad, T., Grønn, A., Haug, D. (eds.) A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø: in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Celebration of his 50th Birthday, Oslo (2006)
Bonnefon, J.F., Feeney, A., Villejoubert, G.: When Some is Actually All: Scalar Inferences in Face-Threatening Contexts. Cognition 112, 249–258 (2009)
Breheny, R.E.T., Ferguson, H.J., Katsos, N.: Taking the Epistemic Step: Toward a Model of On-line Access to Conversational Implicatures. Cognition 126, 423–440 (2013)
Büring, D.: The Least ‘At Least’ Can Do. In: Chang, C.B., Haynie, H.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 114–120. Cascadilla Press, Somerville (2008)
Cummins, C.: The Interpretation and Use of Numerically-Quantified Expressions. PhD thesis (2011), http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/241034
Cummins, C., Katsos, N.: Comparative and Superlative Quantifiers: Pragmatic Effects of Comparison Type. Journal of Semantics 27, 271–305 (2010)
Cummins, C., Sauerland, U., Solt, S.: Granularity and Scalar Implicature in Numerical Expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35, 135–169 (2012)
De Neys, W., Schaeken, W.: When People are More Logical Under Cognitive Load: Dual Task Impact on Scalar Implicature. Experimental Psychology 54, 128–133 (2007)
Fox, D., Hackl, M.: The Universal Density of Measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29, 537–586 (2006)
Geurts, B., Katsos, N., Cummins, C., Moons, J., Noordman, L.: Scalar Quantifiers: Logic, Acquisition, and Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 130–148 (2010)
Geurts, B., Nouwen, R., “At least” et al.: The Semantics of Scalar Modifiers. Language 83, 533–559 (2007)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J.L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Hendriks, P., de Hoop, H.: Optimality Theoretic Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 1–32 (2001)
Horn, L.R.: Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature. In: Schiffrin, D. (ed.) Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT 1984), pp. 11–42. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC (1984)
Krifka, M.: At least some Determiners aren’t Determiners. In: Turner, K. (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, vol. 1, pp. 257–292 (1999)
Krifka, M.: Be Brief and Vague! And how Bidirectional Optimality Theory allows for Verbosity and Precision. In: Restle, D., Zaefferer, D. (eds.) Sounds and Systems. Studies in Structure and Change. A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann, pp. 439–458. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2002)
Krifka, M.: Approximate Interpretations of Number Words: a Case for Strategic Communication. In: Hinrichs, E., Nerbonne, J. (eds.) Theory and Evidence in Semantics, pp. 109–132. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)
Landauer, T.K., Dumais, S.D.: A Solution to Plato’s Problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review 104, 211–240 (1997)
Levinson, S.C.: Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Marty, P., Chemla, E.: Scalar Implicatures: Working Memory and a Comparison with ‘Only’. Ms., LSCP (2011)
Nouwen, R.: Two Kinds of Modified Numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3, 1–41 (2010)
Smolensky, P.: On the Comprehension/Production Dilemma in Child Language. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 720–731 (1996)
Sperber, Wilson: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford (1986/1995)
Zevakhina, N.: Strength and Similarity of Scalar Alternatives. In: Aguilar Guevara, A., Chernilovskaya, A., Nouwen, R. (eds.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, vol. 2, pp. 647–658. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cummins, C. (2013). A Speaker-Referring OT Pragmatics of Quantity Expressions. In: Duchier, D., Parmentier, Y. (eds) Constraint Solving and Language Processing. CSLP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8114. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41577-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41578-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)