Skip to main content

Inter-university Virtual Learning Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover E-Learning Paradigms and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 528))

Abstract

Virtual learning environments are irreversibly shaping the way of teaching and learning at universities. They have become more and more popular as practitioners recognized the advantages virtual learning environments offer when applied in online teaching and learning. Nevertheless, most of the virtual learning environments do not provide straightforward support for inter-university interoperability between heterogeneous learning environments. This paper presents a use case of ITC-Euromaster with collaboration concept for inter-university interoperability. Furthermore, a taxonomy, an ontology and a high level architecture using intelligent software agents that enable dynamic inter-university interoperability are proposed to further develop an existing virtual learning environment used among four European universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rebolj, D., Menzel, K., Dinevski, D.: A virtual classroom for information technology in construction. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 16, 105–114 (2008). doi:10.1002/cae.20129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tibaut, A., Rebolj, D., Čuš Babić, N.: The past and the future of the European master's programme in information technology in construction. In: Electronic proceedings 14th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (14th ICCCBE), Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Moscow, Russia, June 27-29, V (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tibaut, A., Rebolj, D.: ITC Euromaster. http://euromaster.itcedu.net. Accessed 15 Jan 2013

  4. Tibaut, A., Menzel, K.: International e-learning awards, honorable mention, e-learning. http://www.ielassoc.org/awards_program/past_winners.html (2012). Accessed 15 Jan 2013

  5. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M.A., Tsang, E.W.K.: Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: current themes and future prospects. J. Manage. Stud. 45, 677–690 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00773.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Semradova, I.: Designing e-learning courses in humanities and their use in the interuniversity study programmes. Procedia Comput. Sci. 3, 162–166 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubackova, S.: Possibilities of the use of ICT in interuniversity studies. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 28, 29–33 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Wende, M. C.: Internationalization of Higher Education. In: Peterson, P., Baker, E., McGaw, B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education, 4, pp. 540–545. Elsevier, Oxford, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knight, J.: Higher Education Crossing Borders. In: Baker, E., Peterson, P., McGaw, B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education 3rd Edition, pp. 507–513. UK Elsevier Publishers, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutrisno, A., Hartanto, D., Pillay, H.: Transnational higher education programs for facilitating inter-university knowledge transfer: university of Indonesia’s experience. In: ISANA International Education, pp. 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. University of Minnesota, Inter-College Programme. http://www.cce.umn.edu/Inter-College-Program/. Accessed 15 Jan 2013

  12. Dado, E., Beheshti, R.: Digital learning environments for joint master in science programmes in building and construction in Europe: experimenting with tools and technologies. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering and Technology, pp. 440–447 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Uchiyama, K.P., Radin, J.L.: Curriculum mapping in higher education: a vehicle for collaboration. Innovative High. Educ. 10, 10–20 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bruno, J.E.: The use of Monte Carlo techniques for determining optimal size of substitute teacher pools in large urban school districts. Socio-Economic Plann. Sci. 4(4), 415–428 (1970). doi:10.1016/0038-0121(70)90018-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stricker, D., Weibel, D., Wissmath, B.: Efficient learning using a virtual learning environment in a university class. Comput. Educ. 56, 495–504 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Helokunnas, T., Herrala, J.: Knowledge searching and sharing on virtual networks. In: Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, vol. 38, pp. 315–322 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, B., Furst, S., Blackburn, R.: Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organ. Dyn. 36, 259–273 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2007.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alsharo, M. K.: Knowledge sharing in virtual teams: the impact on trust, collaboration, and team effectiveness, PhD diss., University of Colorado (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. He, J.: A Examining factors that affect knowledge sharing and students’ attitude toward their learning experience within virtual teams. Dissertation Abstracts International A, The Humanities and Social Sciences, 71 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleanthous Loizou, S.: Intelligent Support for Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities. University of Leeds, UK (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Usoro, A., Sharratt, M.W., Tsui, E., Shekhar, S.: Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 5, 199–212 (2007). doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Majewski, G., Usoro, A., Khan, I.: Knowledge sharing in immersive virtual communities of practice. Vine 41, 41–62 (2011). doi:10.1108/03055721111115548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bertino, E., Squicciarini, A.: A decentralized approach for controlled sharing of resources in virtual communities. 10th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design, pp. 1–1 (2006). doi:10.1109/CSCWD.2006.253000

  24. Li, W.: Virtual knowledge sharing in a cross-cultural context. J. Knowl. Manage. 14, 38–50 (2010). doi:10.1108/13673271011015552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ray, F.D.P., Rabhi, F.: Knowledge Sharing Infrastructure for Virtual Enterprises. In: Khosrowpour, M. (ed.) Information Technology and Organizations Trends Issues Challenges and Solutions, vol. 1, p. 307. University of South Wales, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. De Meo, P., Garro, A., Terracina, G., Ursino, D.: Personalizing learning programs with X-learn, an XML-based, “user-device” adaptive multi-agent system. Inf. Sci. 177, 1729–1770 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ins.2006.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, F., Wang, M., Shen, R., Han, P.: Community-organizing agent: an artificial intelligent system for building learning communities among large numbers of learners. Comput. Educ. 49, 131–147 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tien, L.T., Osman, K.: Pedagogical agents in interactive multimedia modules: issues of variability. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 7, 605–612 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z.: E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Comput. Educ. 56, 885–899 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jurado, F., Redondo, M., Ortega, M.: Blackboard architecture to integrate components and agents in heterogeneous distributed e-learning systems: an application for learning to program. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 1621–1636 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Latham, A., Crockett, K., McLean, D., Edmonds, B.: A conversational intelligent tutoring system to automatically predict learning styles. Comput. Educ. 59, 95–109 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duo, S., Ying, Z.C.: Personalized e-learning system based on intelligent agent. Phys. Procedia 24, 1899–1902 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, W., Webster, D., Wood, D., Ishaya, T.: An intelligent semantic e-learning framework using context-aware semantic web technologies. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 37, 351–373 (2006). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00610.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sarraipa, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: Knowledge representation in support of adaptable e-learning services for all. Procedia Comput. Sci. 14, 391–402 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sejzi, A.A., Aris, B., Yahya, N.: The phenomenon of virtual university in new age: trends and changes. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 56, 565–572 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shahtalebi, S., Shatalebi, B., Shatalebi, F.: A strategic model of virtual university. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 28, 909–913 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yengin, İ., Karahoca, D., Karahoca, A., Uzunboylu, H.: Re-thinking virtual universities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 5769–5774 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zheng, A.Y., Lawhorn, J.K., Lumley, T., Freeman, S.: Assessment. Application of Bloom’s taxonomy debunks the “MCAT myth”. Science 319, 414–415 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jansen, B.J., Booth, D., Smith, B.: Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Inf. Process. Manage. 45, 643–663 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dalkir, K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jardim-Goncalves, R., Grilo, A., Agostinho, C., et al.: Systematisation of interoperability body of knowledge: the foundation for EI as a science. Enterp. Inf. Syst. (2012). doi:10.1080/17517575.2012.684401

    Google Scholar 

  42. Charalabidis, Y., Gionis, G., Hermann, KM., Martinez, C.: Revision of the enterprise interoperability research roadmap (v 5.0) (2011). ftp://cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/ict/docs/enet/ei-roadmap-5-0-draft_en.pdf

  43. Bourey, J-P., Reyes, G., Doumeingts, G., Berre, JA.: DTG2.3. Report on model driven interoperability—I–V Lab Platform (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. ADM/KDM version 1.2 (2010). http://www.omg.org/spec/KDM/1.2/

  45. ASTM version 1.0 (2011). http://www.omg.org/spec/ASTM/

  46. IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation, High Level Architecture (HLA) (2010). doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5557731

  47. Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 14, 129–135 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wood, W.B.: Sharing in the classroom. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7, 263–264 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tu, Z., Zacharewicz, G., Chen, D.: Developing a web-enabled HLA federate based on portico RTI. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2294–2306 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. MoDisco v.0.10.0. Eclipse.org, http://www.eclipse.org/MoDisco/

  51. The Portico Project (2013). Sourceforge.net, http://www.porticoproject.org/

  52. Tibaut, A.: Intelligent agents for better information management process in construction. In: Proceedings of CIT2000—The CIB-W78, IABSE, EG-SEA-AI International Conference on Construction Information Technology (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tibaut, A.: Resolving disharmony in structurally and semantically heterogeneous information systems, PhD thesis, University of Maribor, p. 146 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Song, F., Zacharewicz, G., Chen, D.: Multi-strategies Ontology Alignment Aggregated by AHP. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Advances in Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 243, pp. 1583–1592. (2012). doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-105-2-1583

  55. Wikipedia. Wikipedia: Course (education). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_(education) (2013). Accessed 15 Jan 2013

  56. Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M.-E., Montoro-Pons, J.D.: Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 367–371 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Klašnja-Milićević, A., Budimac, Z.: Ontology-Based Architecture with Recommendation Strategy in Java Tutoring System. Comp. Sci. Inf. Sys. 10, pp. 237–261 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Akshay, B., Mumbai, C.: Specifications and standards in e-learning. http://www.cdacmumbai.in/design/corporate_site/override/pdf-doc/Specifications_and_Standards_in_E-Learning.pdf (2009). Accessed 15 Jan 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Tibaut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tibaut, A., Rebolj, D., Menzel, K., Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2014). Inter-university Virtual Learning Environment. In: Ivanović, M., Jain, L. (eds) E-Learning Paradigms and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 528. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41965-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41965-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41964-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41965-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics